Comments | yoctograms: 3.141592653589793238

yoctograms

3.141592653589793238

Oct 03, 2009 23:12

[Written]

A test, you meandering mislead medians! The average IQ < 100; ergo consider this to be your mission. There are 005 problems in this entry; solve them all.

t = interest level. Completes will be spared.

( [Filtered // 5% Unhackable] )

it's a test, *rita, *xaldin, *mitsuru, *nephry, *alfons, *patchouli, *leto, a "game", *marisa, *ash, trolling seriously, *zack, *gokudera

Leave a comment

Back to all threads

[Also stuck at 90%] seedprodigy October 4 2009, 06:05:23 UTC

[Oh god Sho you break the mun's head but considering she missed the last set 'cause she was dead and I sat here working on it anyway...]

5% - Does effort really lead to evolution, or is evolution spurred by necessity?

10% - Either Character or Circumstances.

25% - If your !10 is the same as my 10!, then v=3,628,800

50% - That's better than one, I suppose.

65% - Reality. Or, considering how you label people, possibly Radians, ie: everyone else but you.

80% - Yes, Tangent.

90% - According to your equation, x=v=w=constant variable, but have we even discovered any limit to this place yet?

[Can't crack higher than that]

In the eye of the beholder.

yoctograms October 4 2009, 06:11:43 UTC

[I AM SO SORRY FOR ANY BREAKAGE but I hope you enjoyed my riddles~ I love it though.]

Hnnn. I give it 60%; much better than expected of a radian. [Not that he clarifies what ones are right or wrong in his eyes, but now he chuckles...]

The weight of your opinion might exceed two yoctograms.

seedprodigy October 4 2009, 06:21:51 UTC

[Oh it was fun! Though I half wanted to kill him, since it's been years since I did any math more complicated than basic multiplication.]

Would that make it an attogram or should I just aim for a zeptogram?

[He's weird as hell but the math-questions are intriguing.]

yoctograms October 4 2009, 06:25:33 UTC

The weight of two or even three yoctograms is still negligible and ≠ even one zeptogram.

seedprodigy October 4 2009, 06:34:35 UTC

Oh well. It was worth asking once; no answers are found without questions, after all.

yoctograms October 4 2009, 06:39:43 UTC

The solution is invalid without the function leading up to it, even if it is irregular, erroneous, or just plain idiotic.

Back to all threads