(no subject)
my frame of reference has no weight nor color, it shines mindlessly in no certain direction. how could it be labeled a frame of reference without framing its own frame of reference? the idea is anything but absurd, it is the language that complicates it so. if no ground existed upon which the frame of reference could settle, then the latter has just demolished instantly. what's perplexing is that the foundation needs a foundation as well, and so the mirror effect stroles through eternity with a fuzzy sound and a quiet nature. the movement of objects, weightless or not, does not begin when the object moves, but is presistant throughout that object's existance, even before the mental mind discovers it/ the object just exists in this constant rate of, wel, movement, and since no frame of reference truely exists (for the lack of a sure primary foundation), the object moves with no direction at all. that is the core reason for the conclusion that only shadows thruely exist, because they are attached inevitably to an aimeless object, but their direction does exist becaues they follow the object: following an aimeless direction is still an aim to the thing that's following. however, the sun doesn't seem to exist in a certain frame of reference, yet it makes the shadows. that's not troubling at all: the shadows operate by using "the distinct aimelessness" to find their own aims, which, in turn, renders them extant.