Wikipedia answered me
This was in my email inbox this morning:
Re: [Ticket#2010052410002808] page 'arctic fox' was vandalised
Dear [[XXXX]],
Thank you for your email. Our response follows your message.
05/24/2010 01:43 - [[XXXX]] wrote:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arctic_Fox
>
> contains nonsensical information and sexual innuendo of a childish kind.-
>
>
The article has been restored to a previous version to remove the vandalism. Thank
you very much for bringing this to our attention.
Yours sincerely,
William King
Wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org
---
Disclaimer: all mail to this address is answered by volunteers, and responses are
not to be considered an official statement of the Wikimedia Foundation. For
official correspondence, please contact the Wikimedia Foundation by certified mail
at the address listed on http://www.wikimediafoundation.org
In the old times, I would just have fixed it myself. Hell, in the old times, I even started one Wikipedia article. But these days, with edit wars and relevancy debates and cabals with agendas fighting each other, I just sent an email to amorphous 'people who care'. And amazingly, they did.-