Leave a comment

tzikeh January 3 2009, 21:31:01 UTC
Smith's not all that much younger than Tennant

When Tennant got the role he was 35; this kid is 26.

Reply

yahtzee63 January 3 2009, 21:33:26 UTC
Tennant didn't really look 35, though. To go back farther, Davidson was only 30 when he started filming, and Matt Smith will be 27 when he starts. So it's not like he's that dramatically out of range.

Reply

tzikeh January 3 2009, 21:35:06 UTC
True - but I would have liked to have seen an older person.

Reply

yahtzee63 January 3 2009, 21:36:17 UTC
I agree, but I can roll with this. Like I said, just because Smith's not my ideal doesn't mean he won't be good. Nobody can know until we see him in action.

Reply

kradical January 3 2009, 21:34:41 UTC
Actually, when Tennant got the role, he was 34. When he started seriously playing the role, he was 35. By the time Smith starts actually playing the role, he'll be 28 (remember, he doesn't actually begin until 2010).

Reply


Leave a comment

Up