your logic is ridiculously flawed. you called lunchbox's phone, anticipating an answer from him. in no way, shape, or form did you expect me to be the one that responded to the call. therefore, you in no way, shape, or form called me. i just happened to intercept the intended call.
and besides, you didn't call me from lunchbox's phone. his phone and yourself were hours apart at the time of the phone call.
Actually, it was only one hour apart when I called.
And how do you know that I didn't call lunchbox's phone for you? You usually intercept his phone calls when I called, and that's what I anticipated anyway. I called you, knowing that you'd answer the phone. How did I know? 'Cause even if lunchbox answers, you usally take the phone from 'im anyway.
Don't try to think for me, that's why I have brains and you have balls, kthx. :)
i'll let your obviously genderist comment slide, and we'll focus on the issue we're debating here. most times when you call him, i make him hang up the phone. or not answer. as a matter of fact, i can't recall one time when i actually took the phone and talked to you on it. rather, if you were anticipating me intercepting the call, you would have been ready to get hung up on, not ready to converse with myself. therefore, i think it is a safe assumption that you did not call lunchbox's phone number to talk to me.
Reply
Reply
Reply
and besides, you didn't call me from lunchbox's phone. his phone and yourself were hours apart at the time of the phone call.
Reply
And how do you know that I didn't call lunchbox's phone for you? You usually intercept his phone calls when I called, and that's what I anticipated anyway. I called you, knowing that you'd answer the phone. How did I know? 'Cause even if lunchbox answers, you usally take the phone from 'im anyway.
Don't try to think for me, that's why I have brains and you have balls, kthx. :)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment