Cocksucking bastards

Apr 10, 2007 01:05

I'm going to show you a picture. And then I'm going to ask you what's wrong with it (other than the obvious "IT'S ON NOTEBOOK PAPER WHUT") that it should not be posted somewhere.




Now. I drew this the other day, and just got around to posting it on y!gallery. Question is this: was this wrong of me? Should I not have posted it there? Apparently, someone thinks so.

"Can't you see... has been reported, and is hidden pending abuse moderation. More information will be provided to you upon conclusion of the investigation."

...And this was about five minutes after I posted it, after already getting a favorite.

So, my friends, few and far between that you are, shall we brainstorm the possible reasons as to why the hell my picture just got reported?

EDIT: WHAT IN THE HELL IS THIS BULLSHIT
Apparently, y!gallery has a rule that you cannot post art on lined paper because it "takes away from the overall piece". WHAT. THE. FUCK.


Any work where the materials used to create the work take away from the overall piece is not allowed.

This rule does not mean that you need to purchase expensive/"high-quality" tools. It simply means that you must make a good-faith effort to ensure your work is of a reasonable and presentable quality when it is posted.

Examples of poor quality materials may include:

* Line or graph paper
* Dirty or used paper
* Unintentionally smeared lines
* Unintentionally crumpled/ripped/stained paper

WHY THE HELL SHOULD IT MATTER TO YOU? AND WHY THEN, DO YOU NOT GET RID OF THE HORRIBLE SCRIBBLES THAT SOME PEOPLE CALL ART? GO LOOK AT THE ENTIRE SEARCHABLE LIST OF "JEAN HAVOC" AND TELL ME THAT MY ART IS WORTH REPORTING WHEN AT LEAST HALF OF THAT SHIT IS JUST DISGUSTINGLY BAD.
Previous post Next post
Up