the lastest two most interesting things I have read.......................
Sciency one-
Just some neat info if ya into this kind of stuff. Earth may not be our home planet, and Venus could give us an in site into what our planet may become.
Did ancient oceans on Venus last long enough for potential life to have emerged? The answer could be locked inside a hardy mineral called tremolite, which future robotic missions to our neighboring planet could find and study.
The surface of Venus today is extremely dry and hot enough to melt lead. But there is evidence that the planet was much cooler and wetter in the past, before a runaway greenhouse event probably evaporated any oceans the planet had.
In fact, previous research has suggested that the formation of clouds could have slowed this greenhouse effect, allowing oceans to survive for 2 billion years or more.
“For half of its lifetime, Venus could have been a habitable planet with liquid water oceans,” says planetary scientist David Grinspoon of the Denver Museum of Nature and Science in Colorado, US.
If so, chunks of rock ejected by asteroid or comet impacts could have shuttled living organisms between Earth and Venus, he says. “Earth life could have been transplanted to Venus and it would have landed on a wet planet,” he told New Scientist. “Conversely, it’s even possible that Earth life came from Venus.”
Chemical clock
Most of the planet’s surface appears to have been covered over with lava, obscuring records of Venus’ history, and making it difficult to determine how long any oceans might have lasted - a crucial factor in determining whether life could have emerged there.
But Grinspoon and fellow planetary scientist Mark Bullock of the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado, US, say there is reason for hope. A hardy water-bearing mineral called tremolite could be the key to unlocking Venus’ past, they say.
Experiments by Natasha Johnson of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and Bruce Fegley Jr of Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, both in the US, have previously shown that tremolite, which forms in the presence of water, is tough enough that it could have survived on Venus’ surface to the present.
Grinspoon and Bullock believe tremolite can be used as a kind of chemical clock. Because researchers know how long tremolite takes to decompose into other minerals in the extreme temperatures on Venus, tremolite abundances could be used to determine how long ago the rocks containing it were formed, and thus how recently water was present on Venus’ surface.
High ground
Future robotic landers could look for tremolite, Grinspoon says. Although robots would not last long on the blisteringly hot surface, a couple of hours would suffice to measure it using modern instruments, he says. He thinks such a mission is unlikely in the near future, but very likely in the next 10 to 20 years.
Ellen Stofan of University College in London, UK, says she is optimistic about the prospects for finding evidence of an older, wetter Venus, despite the lava flows covering much of the surface.
“We know at least locally and regionally where we have bits of older terrain that poke up through the volcanic plains,” she told New Scientist. “All of a sudden, Venus may go from a place where we thought life never had a chance to take hold, to possibly a real player in the story of life in our solar system and the evolution of habitable planets.”
Grinspoon says the possibility of long-lasting oceans on Venus is especially important in light of recent studies suggesting that Mars may not have been warm and wet in its past, as some scientists had proposed.
Warm and wet
“If that’s true, then the two warm and wet bodies in the early solar system would have been Earth and Venus, and as far as a place for the origin of life, Venus was equally favourable to Earth - Venus may be the closer analog to early Earth,” he says.
If oceans on Venus lasted long enough, then more complex life forms might even have emerged, he says: “If we get into the 2 billion year range in timescale then you could imagine that more complex evolution happened - not just an origin of life, but time for interesting evolutionary development.”
Grinspoon and Bullock presented their findings today at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society’s Division for Planetary Sciences in Orlando, Florida, US.
and another sciency one-
n humans and many other animals, males age faster and die earlier than females.
New research suggests this might happen because of intense competition over sex.
Scientists compared monogamous species with polygynous species, in which each male mates with many females. Males in monogamous species, such as the barnacle goose or the dwarf mongoose, naturally compete less over females than ones in polygynous species, such as the red-winged blackbird or the savannah baboon.
After investigating about 20 different vertebrate species, researchers Tim Clutton-Brock and Kavita Isvaran at the University of Cambridge in England found the more polygynous a species was, the more likely their males were to age faster and die earlier than females.
The researchers explained that as competition among males for sex grows more intense, each male on average has less time to breed. As such, there is no strong incentive to evolve longevity among males in such species.
Since men age faster and die earlier than women, these findings suggest that "at the time when current human physiology evolved, perhaps around the late Stone Age, polygynous breeding was the norm," Clutton-Brock told LiveScience. "Of course, this doesn't provide any justification for polygyny or promiscuity now for males."
Clutton-Brock and Isvaran detailed their findings online Oct. 17 in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
Just some neat info if ya into this kind of stuff. Earth may not be our home planet, and Venus could give us an in site into what our planet may become.
Did ancient oceans on Venus last long enough for potential life to have emerged? The answer could be locked inside a hardy mineral called tremolite, which future robotic missions to our neighboring planet could find and study.
The surface of Venus today is extremely dry and hot enough to melt lead. But there is evidence that the planet was much cooler and wetter in the past, before a runaway greenhouse event probably evaporated any oceans the planet had.
In fact, previous research has suggested that the formation of clouds could have slowed this greenhouse effect, allowing oceans to survive for 2 billion years or more.
“For half of its lifetime, Venus could have been a habitable planet with liquid water oceans,” says planetary scientist David Grinspoon of the Denver Museum of Nature and Science in Colorado, US.
If so, chunks of rock ejected by asteroid or comet impacts could have shuttled living organisms between Earth and Venus, he says. “Earth life could have been transplanted to Venus and it would have landed on a wet planet,” he told New Scientist. “Conversely, it’s even possible that Earth life came from Venus.”
Chemical clock
Most of the planet’s surface appears to have been covered over with lava, obscuring records of Venus’ history, and making it difficult to determine how long any oceans might have lasted - a crucial factor in determining whether life could have emerged there.
But Grinspoon and fellow planetary scientist Mark Bullock of the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado, US, say there is reason for hope. A hardy water-bearing mineral called tremolite could be the key to unlocking Venus’ past, they say.
Experiments by Natasha Johnson of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and Bruce Fegley Jr of Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, both in the US, have previously shown that tremolite, which forms in the presence of water, is tough enough that it could have survived on Venus’ surface to the present.
Grinspoon and Bullock believe tremolite can be used as a kind of chemical clock. Because researchers know how long tremolite takes to decompose into other minerals in the extreme temperatures on Venus, tremolite abundances could be used to determine how long ago the rocks containing it were formed, and thus how recently water was present on Venus’ surface.
High ground
Future robotic landers could look for tremolite, Grinspoon says. Although robots would not last long on the blisteringly hot surface, a couple of hours would suffice to measure it using modern instruments, he says. He thinks such a mission is unlikely in the near future, but very likely in the next 10 to 20 years.
Ellen Stofan of University College in London, UK, says she is optimistic about the prospects for finding evidence of an older, wetter Venus, despite the lava flows covering much of the surface.
“We know at least locally and regionally where we have bits of older terrain that poke up through the volcanic plains,” she told New Scientist. “All of a sudden, Venus may go from a place where we thought life never had a chance to take hold, to possibly a real player in the story of life in our solar system and the evolution of habitable planets.”
Grinspoon says the possibility of long-lasting oceans on Venus is especially important in light of recent studies suggesting that Mars may not have been warm and wet in its past, as some scientists had proposed.
Warm and wet
“If that’s true, then the two warm and wet bodies in the early solar system would have been Earth and Venus, and as far as a place for the origin of life, Venus was equally favourable to Earth - Venus may be the closer analog to early Earth,” he says.
If oceans on Venus lasted long enough, then more complex life forms might even have emerged, he says: “If we get into the 2 billion year range in timescale then you could imagine that more complex evolution happened - not just an origin of life, but time for interesting evolutionary development.”
Grinspoon and Bullock presented their findings today at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society’s Division for Planetary Sciences in Orlando, Florida, US.
and another sciency one-
n humans and many other animals, males age faster and die earlier than females.
New research suggests this might happen because of intense competition over sex.
Scientists compared monogamous species with polygynous species, in which each male mates with many females. Males in monogamous species, such as the barnacle goose or the dwarf mongoose, naturally compete less over females than ones in polygynous species, such as the red-winged blackbird or the savannah baboon.
After investigating about 20 different vertebrate species, researchers Tim Clutton-Brock and Kavita Isvaran at the University of Cambridge in England found the more polygynous a species was, the more likely their males were to age faster and die earlier than females.
The researchers explained that as competition among males for sex grows more intense, each male on average has less time to breed. As such, there is no strong incentive to evolve longevity among males in such species.
Since men age faster and die earlier than women, these findings suggest that "at the time when current human physiology evolved, perhaps around the late Stone Age, polygynous breeding was the norm," Clutton-Brock told LiveScience. "Of course, this doesn't provide any justification for polygyny or promiscuity now for males."
Clutton-Brock and Isvaran detailed their findings online Oct. 17 in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B.