I'm not an interventionist. I'm not an isolationist. One frustrating aspect of political discussion in America is the tendency for the media and political figures to act as though those are the only two possibilities when it comes to foreign affairs
(
Read more... )
Unfortunately, Iraq is a bad example to use. The original mission there had nothing to do with "spreading democracy." It was about finding and removing the threat of WMDs (does anybody remember them?) with a strong implication that they had something to do with the 9/11 attacks (they didn't, although it doesn't seem many Americans know that, either...) It was only when it became clear that there WERE no WMDs that the administration and their apologists tried to RetCon the mission into "spreading democracy," "freeing the Iraq people from a brutal dictator," and the ever-popular "war on terror."
Yes, it's horrible that genocides are occuring, but I'm not entirely sure military intervention is the best permanent solution. I think a lot of racial strife is rooted in economic and political issues, and once a group is sufficiently stable, shooting and bombing the neighborhood next door becomes a lot less attractive. We need to find a way to encourage investment in such a way the the poor are lifted economically, but I'm not sure how to do that, or if we even CAN do that.
Reply
Reply
Thanks for the rec!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment