Tasmanian Giant Crab

May 02, 2012 21:31

I had just came across this article on Tumblr. Good lord!

Look at the size of this crab! )

crab, crustacean

Leave a comment

lishd May 5 2012, 20:07:19 UTC
...how does he weigh 15 pounds but produce 20lb meat? i presume they meant 150lb, but that's some interesting fractal crab right there

Reply

bailzzararco May 5 2012, 20:23:43 UTC
Oh, I hadn't noticed that. Yeah, must be a typo.

Reply

velum_cado May 5 2012, 20:29:31 UTC
It says, "Would have produced 20lbs of meat". Since those crabs can get to about 30 lbs, I assume they mean when it was fully grown.

Reply

lishd May 5 2012, 20:32:12 UTC
it also says, "Claude is 100 times bigger than a standard UK shore crab." it's more reasonable to assume a typo instead of a weird subtext of adult size.

Reply

velum_cado May 5 2012, 20:58:46 UTC
Well, it's The Daily Mail, so who knows what they're talking about. LOL But they definitely don't mean 150 lbs.

Reply

lishd May 5 2012, 21:00:24 UTC
15kg then? who knows!

Reply

velum_cado May 5 2012, 21:03:47 UTC
It appears the 20 lbs of meat thing is wrong. Tasmanian Giant Crabs are around 30 lbs, fully grown, the internets tell me. They also tell me crabs tend to yield 14% - 25% meat, so I was wrong. You're not getting 20 lbs from a 30 lb crab. But I don't think it was a typo. I think the Daily Mail is just... wrong. :P But, whatever. Melted butter, pls!

Reply

madman101 May 6 2012, 03:57:01 UTC
maybe a much larger crab may have less shell(etc.) relative to flesh, (esp. if it may be a unique subspecies)

Reply

velum_cado May 6 2012, 09:44:48 UTC
That's what I wondered, too, but I couldn't find any information on that specific type of crab. I'd love to get my hands on one of them to find out, though!

Reply

madman101 May 6 2012, 18:06:26 UTC
i'd be careful w/ the hands ha ha -

i think alaska king crab gets pretty big - so maybe that's a lead...(?!)

i also thought: the larger the ball, (or whatever), the greater the volume-to-surface-area. ergo, for crabs, probably "less" shell. & unusually over-sized crabs may outgrow their natural predators and not need a relative thick shell so much anymore. it also might simply be a growth hormone thing. - or, of course, it may be a typo.

sorry i don't have a good crab link for you though!

Reply

celarania May 5 2012, 20:36:12 UTC
I think it's some funky math. It would be hard to get 150 pounds into 15 inches.

Reply

lishd May 5 2012, 20:37:44 UTC
there's a dick joke in there somewhere.

Reply

celarania May 5 2012, 20:53:39 UTC
I'm serious.

If we take the crab to be a 15in x 10in x 5in box (with all his little legs folded underneath and I'm being generous), that's about 38 cm x 25 cm x 13 cm, or 12350 cm^3. Given that 2 pounds is about 1 kg, that would be 75 kg. To have 75 kg in 12350 cm^3 that would be a density of about 6 g/cm^3. Considering water and the human body have a density of about 1 g/cm^3, that's six times as dense as the human body, and you get metals having that density.

Reply

lishd May 5 2012, 20:55:13 UTC
my response was not in doubt of your statement.

Reply

anowyn May 5 2012, 20:54:23 UTC
He's made of dark matter!

Reply

lishd May 5 2012, 20:55:44 UTC
crabs have both light & dark matter in them, & both matters should be prepared differently

Reply


Leave a comment

Up