The Birth of a Botfly - Not for the Squeamish

Dec 14, 2010 16:11


Dr. Mark W. Moffett (also known as "Dr. Bugs" for his extensive research and contributions, and "crazy" for his methods) is quite a character in the entomology and conservationist world. If you've ever seen a picture of a bug in National Geographic, it was probably by him as they've used over 500 of his photographs. Below the cut, you can see his ( Read more... )

parasite, maggot, botfly

Leave a comment

four_calamities December 14 2010, 23:03:03 UTC
IT'S A GIRL. IT'S A GIIIIIRRRRLLLL.

I have to say, he's one brave dude; and I have to agree, he's probably as close as to experiencing the miracle of birth as any man will probably get, hahaha.

I found this incredibly entertaining. Gross, but entertaining. He's pretty devoted to his interests. Also, that is one nasty hole in his hand. I've always wondered what the risk would be of a bot fly burrowing too close to a major artery or vein, and causing a little more damage than intended as a result. Or if the damage resulting from fly-chewing on the muscles would be permanent. I saw one instance where one had burrowed into someone's neck. That was disgusting.

Reply

iyoichi December 14 2010, 23:09:52 UTC
AIN'T HE THE NEATEST?!

Someone asked him about the damage done in the youtube commentary. I'm actually curious myself about the same thing...

Reply

soren_grey December 14 2010, 23:14:33 UTC
I have to say, he's one brave dude; and I have to agree, he's probably as close as to experiencing the miracle of birth as any man will probably get, hahaha.

http://www.wellsphere.com/general-medicine-article/men-can-now-get-pregnant/256542

Reply

four_calamities December 14 2010, 23:21:15 UTC
Holy crap, I forgot about Lee.

Reply

iyoichi December 14 2010, 23:29:51 UTC
Hoax, but still fun.

Reply

four_calamities December 14 2010, 23:48:12 UTC
Oh. WELL THEN, I'll go back to my original statement.

Reply

theweaselking December 14 2010, 23:54:04 UTC

... )

Reply

iyoichi December 15 2010, 00:07:15 UTC
... okay, I'll give it to you.

Reply

skittlewolf December 15 2010, 00:14:11 UTC
Yay Thomas Beatie!

Reply

lovelynepenthe December 15 2010, 03:41:23 UTC
He does very carefully (it seems) stipulate "male human being" not "man". Mr. Beattie is a man, but he still is chromosomally female (barring intersex conditions, which would probably preclude pregnancy anyway) and has the requisite manufacturing equipment pre-installed, apparently. (I wasn't particularly impressed with his publicity stunt; I can't imagine he's the only trans man to have ever given birth.

Having a XY male human without a uterus would be an impressive trick, biologically speaking.

Reply

heartttcore December 15 2010, 09:21:08 UTC
You're correct, Mr. Beattie is far from being the only trans male to ever give birth. I know men personally who've done it, and without going on Oprah too. (He's probably done it the most times, though! He's up to something like 4 kids now.)

Also, there's no reason to bar intersex conditions. They're actually quite common, occurring in 1.7% of all births in the US. (Compare, for instance with the rate of albino births -- 1 in 20,000 -- a condition, which is significantly rarer but one which most people can recall having seen at least once.) 1 in 500 males are born with an extra X chromosome (XXY), but of those only half actually have Klinefelter Syndrome. Point being: being intersex isn't odd or unlikely. Also, sex ain't all in the chromosomes. In fact, it's mostly other places.

Reply

lovelynepenthe December 15 2010, 09:44:25 UTC
I was under the impression that female humans with abnormal sex chromosome number were generally infertile and that thus Beattie must be XX, but I seem to have been wrong there. (And I should have specified XX anyway.)

Side note: one of the downsides of being totally engrossed in the academic/scientific world, for me at least, is the sometimes upsetting experiences I have with the internet. I just happily and unthinkingly typed "XXX" into google, expecting to find information on intersex as the top hits. A week ago, I searched "LaTeX tips" and was similarly thwarted.

Reply

heartttcore December 15 2010, 10:54:17 UTC
For the record, it is possible to be a genetic XX male.

Honestly? I'll bet you neither Thomas Beattie nor any of his doctors could confirm his karyotype as being one thing or another. Most people don't get tested for genetic "abnormalities" unless physical symptoms present, which I guess is why genetic intersex conditions are so stigmatized. Is his karyotype most probably XX? Yeah, sure. But it doesn't sit right with me to make that assumption because karyotypes are, again, far from the only contributing factor when it comes to the development of primary sex characteristics.

Reply

iyoichi December 16 2010, 02:43:56 UTC
I love this whole conversation. ♥

Reply

logansrogue December 16 2010, 17:21:33 UTC
Me too. Respectful of his trans status, but totally scientific. <3!

Reply

theidolhands December 15 2010, 13:53:44 UTC
agree.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up