I'm not convinced that they did (I am very bored) and haven't found anything ton contradict that. I know that 40 years earlier they generally didn't but that's not a great help in the underwear department.
*corvid now wonders exactly how naked she's gonna make a certain half-drowned police inspector become in the name of getting-him-out-of-wet-clothes...*
*tries to canvas neuron opinion.* Hm. Results mixed but seem to fall into the following categories: 'Heehee - naked!' 'Can we steal his coat?' 'Can I have his boots?' 'He'll sulk'. Which translates roughly as one for, one against, and twice as many not caring so long as they've a chance to steal his swishy coat. *sigh* Not overly helpful.
Yes, and there's loads of info on the net about historical underwear for girls... but the main question was whether in 1820 blokes wore any at all or not. And the answer is - nope, they were commando beneath their breeches =) Since in the story it's a bloke who's getting undressed and not a girl, that was why i needed to know.
Comments 13
Reply
Reply
Cool.
Thank-you to you and your boredom!
*corvid now wonders exactly how naked she's gonna make a certain half-drowned police inspector become in the name of getting-him-out-of-wet-clothes...*
Reply
Reply
Hm. Results mixed but seem to fall into the following categories: 'Heehee - naked!' 'Can we steal his coat?' 'Can I have his boots?' 'He'll sulk'. Which translates roughly as one for, one against, and twice as many not caring so long as they've a chance to steal his swishy coat. *sigh* Not overly helpful.
Reply
Surely men's underwear is pretty straight forward compared to women's?
Reply
Reply
Brrrr...I'm glad that's no longer the case with it being as cold as it is :)
Reply
Leave a comment