I never get the same results twice. >.

[wortcunner]

Introverted (I) 66.67% Extroverted (E) 33.33%
Imaginative (N) 68.42% Realistic (S) 31.58%
Intellectual (T) 51.43% Emotional (F) 48.57%
Easygoing (P) 63.33% Organized (J) 36.67%

Your type is: INTP
You are an Architect, possible professions include - strategic planning, writer, staff development, lawyer, architect, software

Comments

I promised an explanation.

[wortcunner]

You see, the problem with these tests is that it is possible to balance an attribute. They don't tell you that when you take 'em, 'cause then everyone would just respond down the middle. Myers-Briggs type tests do not preclude the possibility of being both I or E, for example, it's just unrealistic to assume that in a stable personality both can exist constantly in equal abundance. Originally, I had learned the the middle characteristics (the N-S, T-F dichotomy) were less varaible in the general test-taking population, and so were better indications of personality. I mean, it's more likely you're feeling introverted or disorganized a day rather than feeling an overall trend toward realism or emotional thinking. You rarely wake up with the notion "today I'll think with my feelings" outside of children's literature. =) In any case, what I think my problem with these damn tests is that I'm caught between over-analysis and carelessness. I know the tests are really interesting but ultimately meaningless, so I rarely think about my answers, save for those very few which define me. So there's a lot of "give" in certain areas. And so I end up with aberrations along axis which are normally supposed to be more stable. However, I only have this problem with the latter two categories. I think those who know me can understand why.

Yes, I'm making comments on my own journal. It's the only thing I could think of to keep me awake.