This makes me really happy!

Feb 03, 2007 13:38


Read more... )

Leave a comment

womenfly February 5 2007, 16:30:17 UTC
Hmm...I really like the Earthsea books, though I think the 4th one, Tehanu, is the best. Josh likes them a lot, too.

But really, those are not Science Fiction.

Some of her books that I like and that qualify more as s/f are The Dispossesed and The Left Hand of Darkness. The thing about her, really, is that she's a writer of speculative fiction, more than of fantasy or science fiction. While her books are often set in the future or in alternate realities, the richness of her work is in her studies of human nature. She takes people and places them in circumstances just enough removed from our own that we can use some objectivity when thinking about their situations and choices but still recognize ourselves in them. A lot of fantasy and s/f writers set out to do that, but what sets Ursula LeGuin apart is her ability to create detailed, believable civilizations, on scales ranging from governments to families.

I also like her short stories. I recommend the collection Unlocking the Air. While the stories are not expressly fantasy or s/f, I think that (besides being very well written) they examine human beings and what we're capable of in ways I hadn't thought of before. In that sense, they are very true to the tradition of speculative fiction.

Reply

specialfriend99 February 6 2007, 01:15:32 UTC
ya, i thought it was a trilogy, i'll have to look into the other books

basically i just thought the second book, tombs of atuan was too slow and boring and didn't really do much

i'm currently trying to finish the original foundation trilogy by asimov, and i'll see what i do after that

Reply

womenfly February 6 2007, 03:50:06 UTC
See, I thought the Foundation books were really dull. And I'm not afraid to admit it, even though it lowers my science fiction dork cred.

I agree that Tombs of Atuan is not the best book ever. Tenar is a main character in Tehanu, though, and she's way cooler.

Reply

specialfriend99 February 7 2007, 00:10:13 UTC
ya, they're definately not the most enthralling and vivid worlds, but i read asimov more for social and philosphical implications of what the story than for rich language or sympathetic characterization

Reply


Leave a comment

Up