Global Warming
I think Global Warming is like religion. Agnosticism is the best bet.
No matter how 'scientific' it all is, it isn't. I can find quite convincing arguments on both sides, and they're all bullshit. They all make arbitrary distinctions and look at only specific points...
I've been reading an argument thread on it, with all the environmental liberals being just as bad as the douchebag conservatives (seriously, they suck even outside this thread) - it all goes nowhere. Because climate change is such a difficult beast to successfully and accurately model, asking for r
I know there are a lot of people who say "maths is a definite science, there's always a right answer", which is absolute crap beyond high school (especially applied maths like I'm doing), but at least it seems a lot harder to write papers just to further your own agenda. YAUS I WILL MISLEAD THE ACADEMIA INTO BELIEVING FINITE DIFFERENCE IS BETTER THAN FINITE VOLUME.
Now I go get some breakfast before plunging back into the mind-numbing retyping of my honours thesis.
No matter how 'scientific' it all is, it isn't. I can find quite convincing arguments on both sides, and they're all bullshit. They all make arbitrary distinctions and look at only specific points...
I've been reading an argument thread on it, with all the environmental liberals being just as bad as the douchebag conservatives (seriously, they suck even outside this thread) - it all goes nowhere. Because climate change is such a difficult beast to successfully and accurately model, asking for r
I know there are a lot of people who say "maths is a definite science, there's always a right answer", which is absolute crap beyond high school (especially applied maths like I'm doing), but at least it seems a lot harder to write papers just to further your own agenda. YAUS I WILL MISLEAD THE ACADEMIA INTO BELIEVING FINITE DIFFERENCE IS BETTER THAN FINITE VOLUME.
Now I go get some breakfast before plunging back into the mind-numbing retyping of my honours thesis.