(Untitled)

Dec 12, 2009 04:04

Hey. Pink. I got us a pet.

Leave a comment

observershikou December 13 2009, 05:22:22 UTC
... I see mention of me, if that isn't rude to say.

Reply

whiterthanblack December 13 2009, 06:38:11 UTC
It isn't.

Reply

observershikou December 13 2009, 06:39:44 UTC
... I don't want to come to assumptions by myself, so I would rather that you explain what you need to say.

Reply

{Private to Erland and Fluffy] whiterthanblack December 13 2009, 06:41:58 UTC
Uh... basically we've weighed the options. And barring Endymion removal helping, me and Pink think Shiroko's going to require either years of therapy or someone to... educate her.

Reply

Re: {Private to Erland and Fluffy] observershikou December 13 2009, 06:43:26 UTC
... "Educate her"?

Reply

Re: {Private to Erland and Fluffy] whiterthanblack December 13 2009, 06:48:11 UTC
... We let Erland or Noriko make her sane again by force.

So either she loses most of her remaining developmental years and is a dropout due to going crazy and untold medical bills...

or we let friends of ours rip out pieces of her mind that have made her unable to function, but could result in Shiroko no longer being in front...

And both options probably could result in her lapsing to multiple personalities.

So it's between letting her be a dropout... or brainwash her.

Reply

Re: {Private to Erland and Fluffy] observershikou December 13 2009, 06:55:27 UTC
... Ah.

... I don't really know what to say on that, honestly. I'd be against the first option, certainly, but...

I don't... Really think I can be for the second option, either.

Reply

Re: {Private to Erland and Fluffy] whiterthanblack December 13 2009, 06:56:57 UTC
... Then its letting her be locked up in a white cell somewhere.

Reply

Re: {Private to Erland and Fluffy] observershikou December 13 2009, 06:59:40 UTC
Which of course, I'd never let happen, but...

... How extensive would this... "Brainwashing" be?

Reply

Re: {Private to Erland and Fluffy] whiterthanblack December 13 2009, 07:05:55 UTC
... Depends how much Erland has to deal with. He'd be trying preserve her personality as much as possible.

But... I think he's explained there's no absolutes, and fixing one pipe, so to speak, might make two more burst.

Reply

Re: {Private to Erland and Fluffy] observershikou December 13 2009, 07:10:12 UTC
... Mng... I really don't want her to go through what I had to, but...

... I really wish they were at least definitive about this. I don't want either of them to change anything unnecessarily, just because of how fragile this is... And I don't... Entirely know that I can trust either of them to stick to that.

Reply

Re: {Private to Erland and Fluffy] whiterthanblack December 13 2009, 07:15:38 UTC
I'll kill him if he goes overboard.

But... It's like we're being told to murder one of three children to save the other two. Ugh.

Reply

Re: {Private to Erland and Fluffy] observershikou December 13 2009, 07:22:30 UTC
... And what about Noriko? What if she goes overboard? She's probably more... Efficient about this, but... While I like her very much, it does not mean that I would trust her to not make any... Changes, that she herself might judge as fit.

Just... Mng. Why is it that these situations go and pop up, anyway...

Reply

Re: {Private to Erland and Fluffy] whiterthanblack December 13 2009, 07:25:25 UTC
And then Shiroko was a spoiled rotten bratty princess.

We live very interesting lives.

Reply

Re: {Private to Erland and Fluffy] observershikou December 13 2009, 07:29:36 UTC
... Which is something I definitely don't want. Mn...

... I don't think I can ever really agree to it in good conscience, honestly. I don't think I could agree to any of this, really. I don't want to put her through that pain, but... I really don't want her to go through what I did.

... Though at the least, I guess hers wouldn't be continuous for over twelve years, due to what they could do...

Reply

Re: {Private to Erland and Fluffy] whiterthanblack December 13 2009, 07:34:15 UTC
It'd likely be 12 hours/days instead of 12 years, relatively speaking.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up