I tried to reflect on season seven generally. I honestly did. But the thing is? I don't feel like I've got a handle on it.
I don't feel like I've followed the emotional arc of any character since season 5. And I've tried, honestly I have. I want to feel that I can trust the writers with their own characters (and forget that I never really connected
(
Read more... )
... Um. Sorry. I went off on a tangent, didn't I?
Anyway, the point is, I rather like television precisely because it does have that sort of collaborative feel to it, which I'm accustomed to seeing in pretty much any literature but that after 1920ish. And usually it works well for Supernatural. Just, not always, lately. Granulated is a very good term for season 7, and I think they didn't do themselves any favours by combining the looser overall plot arc (or, you know, just less compelling villains) with all those mini-hiatuses: it DID make it much harder to keep track, or even to care, than if we'd only had to put the book down once before picking it back up (as it were). And you're right, there have been brilliant moments and stories in the last two seasons by any estimation - it's certainly not like all the talent has disappeared with the end of the Reign of Kripke, or anything like that. But is it necessary, I wonder, to have a single authorial grand vision in order to get something like that overall arching coherence of plot and story, like we had in seasons 1-5?
Reply
Leave a comment