On Dan Brown, and Writing. Not a non sequitur.

Jan 13, 2009 21:11

"Renowned curator Jacques Saunière staggered through the vaulted archway of the museum's Grand Gallery. He lunged for the nearest painting he could see, a Caravaggio. Grabbing the gilded frame, the seventy-six-year-old man heaved the masterpiece toward himself until it tore from the wall and Saunière collapsed backward in a heap beneath the canvas ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

lilitufire January 14 2009, 07:09:36 UTC
Dan Brown and David Eddings have a lot in common that way :)

If you haven't read it, I rather enjoyed Stephen King's "On Writing" - it's worth a hunt out. And Mr King knows how to write a yarn as well as anyone, or so I think anyway. I don't really mind that I don't have educated literary tastes :)

Reply

tyrell January 14 2009, 08:19:29 UTC
I thought "On writing" was very good, yes.

Reply

stu_n January 14 2009, 10:23:01 UTC
'On Writing' is pretty much a more readable version of Strunk & White, though.

Reply

tyrell January 14 2009, 10:28:51 UTC
I thought it concentrated more on the process of writing, but it certainly does parrot the 'and then take out all the excess words you don't need' advice. I got the impression that was from experience, though. And hey, a more readable version of S+W reaching a modern audience is all good!

Reply

cairmen January 14 2009, 11:14:12 UTC
Yeah, but that's a significant advantage...

Reply

yesaffirmative January 14 2009, 15:43:57 UTC
Fucking word.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up