Amanda has a very strong attachment to John, and is extremely misguided.
She told you he was helping people. He did help people, so to speak, by causing them severe psychological distress and physical pain. He tortured them. After suffering and surviving the things he put them through, anyone would glad to be alive.
He hurt them, traumatized them, and they were thankful to get out alive.
Understood. Inmate Amanda Young clearly unrectified; proposed method of rectification through testing to destruction unable to select for desired qualities except survival instinct. Survival instinct low-value to system when system survival not included in individual survival.
[There's a short time delay while he reconstructs his answer in plaintext.]
She exhibits none of the qualities she says her mentor valued. Their tests only allow for the survival of individuals willing to do anything to survive. Ruthlessness in an individual is of no value to the society if it can be directed against that society at any moment.
John Kramer was in the final stages of terminal cancer. He was 'testing' people to try and instill in them a sense of value. To make them appreciate their lives. He was a sick, mentally ill old man who convinced a sick girl to follow in his footsteps.
And then killed her when he realized her sickness wasn't quite the same as his.
Query: Warden Sarah Harding aware of Inmate Amanda Young's opinion on destructive rectification?
Reference provided.
Reply
Um. I've forgotten your name. Sorry.
Reply
Further query: Sentiment expressed about "John" factual or propaganda?
[Did the crazy shit she started sharing about her world actually happen?]
Security Program JA307020, designation: "Rinzler".
Reply
Factual or...
[Pause.]
Amanda has a very strong attachment to John, and is extremely misguided.
She told you he was helping people. He did help people, so to speak, by causing them severe psychological distress and physical pain. He tortured them. After suffering and surviving the things he put them through, anyone would glad to be alive.
He hurt them, traumatized them, and they were thankful to get out alive.
Reply
Understood. Inmate Amanda Young clearly unrectified; proposed method of rectification through testing to destruction unable to select for desired qualities except survival instinct. Survival instinct low-value to system when system survival not included in individual survival.
Reply
Are you saying her tests only appeal to survival instinct?
Reply
She exhibits none of the qualities she says her mentor valued. Their tests only allow for the survival of individuals willing to do anything to survive. Ruthlessness in an individual is of no value to the society if it can be directed against that society at any moment.
Reply
Amanda's mentor would agree with you: he tested her, in the end, to see if she valued human life. She failed.
Reply
No apology needed. Clarity of communication rests on the communicator.
He placed no higher value on it. How could he judge?
Reply
John Kramer was in the final stages of terminal cancer. He was 'testing' people to try and instill in them a sense of value. To make them appreciate their lives. He was a sick, mentally ill old man who convinced a sick girl to follow in his footsteps.
And then killed her when he realized her sickness wasn't quite the same as his.
Reply
Understood.
Query: Objections to JA307020 monitoring Inmate Amanda Young's activities, reporting back to Warden Sarah Harding?
[He's getting better about this reporting back to the Wardens thing.]
Reply
Reply
Intent to observe because of Inmate Amanda Young's potential danger to others.
[He's a Security Program. It's his job.]
Reply
All I can say is: make sure your warden knows what you're up to and don't get caught.
Reply
[Long pause.]
Thank you.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment