I think they suggested the oil because the original recipe was for boneless/skinless breasts. The fat from the skin in your alterations would compensate for the oil.
that's irrelevant really. you have all the sauces and the steam that keep the chicken moist. it's the point of a crock pot. i always use boneless/skinless chicken and it's always nice and tender
I disagree - if there's no fat then you're covering dry chicken with a wet sauce. It works, but it doesn't make the chicken taste good. It makes the chicken taste like sauce. That's not tender meat.
The point of a crockpot isn't steam - it's long low heat, specifically to replicate the action of a dutch oven in an oven, and that's historically used for long slow cooking of beef and pork with lots of connective tissue and fat to melt off.
You can certainly use a crockpot to cook just about anything, but it's not the best tool for boneless, skinless chicken.
I tried this recipe a couple of months ago. I swear to you, I followed the directions to a T, and when I checked on it when I came home (had only been cooking for 5.5 hours on LOW), everything had turned into black, burnt sludge. The breasts were black hockey pucks. I think something is wrong with my crock pot!
Comments 14
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
There's really no other fat in the recipe and the chicken would get dry and stringy without it.
Reply
Reply
The point of a crockpot isn't steam - it's long low heat, specifically to replicate the action of a dutch oven in an oven, and that's historically used for long slow cooking of beef and pork with lots of connective tissue and fat to melt off.
You can certainly use a crockpot to cook just about anything, but it's not the best tool for boneless, skinless chicken.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment