a brief synopsis of the last few days

Jun 27, 2006 22:03


Thursday: Phone line, and thus internet, dies.

Friday: Caught up with Nudge and made cookies.

Saturday:
Read more... )

clumsy me, cookies, catching up, camel, chocolate

Leave a comment

arch13_in_a_hat June 27 2006, 12:59:56 UTC
"Now: Timewasting and then sleep."

I read that as: Now: Timewashing and then sleep.

I wonder how you wash time...

Reply

wethis June 28 2006, 08:58:04 UTC
perhaps by removing one's memories of it, or the thoughts of it passing...

very metaphysical there. You've got my head all in a muddle!

Reply

arch13_in_a_hat June 28 2006, 10:03:44 UTC
Perhaps...

Indeed, and so un-intentional! It confused me too.

Reply

wethis June 28 2006, 10:06:38 UTC
Maybe if a kind of clear light, or a diswasher at faster than the speed of light... but then again you'd still be travelling through time...

Fuck. This is just silly. I suck at this metaphysical shit! Oh well.

Reply

arch13_in_a_hat June 28 2006, 10:14:02 UTC
Maybe even just removing the dirt from one's memomory would wash it... Hence leaving clean time in the past, although you would just be perceiving the time past as washed and not actually washing the time itself. So you would definatly have to go back in time to truly wash it, but then you would be altering the timeline and thus may not end up existing to go back in time to wash the past time in the future. So if that is true then it would then be impossible to wash time...

Reply

wethis June 28 2006, 10:30:14 UTC
That makes sense. It must be much like being stuck in a time loop whereby one must go into the past/future to warn self of past/future, but can't because it would alter the past/future so there wouldn't be the warning, or maybe it already was altered and then the past/future wouldn't work... ah darn, i've gone and confused myself again. But I agree with the impossibility of washing time, in itself it is not physically tangible anyway and thus could not be washed in a conventional sense in the first place, being a concept rather than an object.

Reply

arch13_in_a_hat June 28 2006, 12:41:09 UTC
Indeed. Quite an interesting topic...

Reply


Leave a comment

Up