I have been watching Iron Man II absolutely obsessively, mostly because I'm too broke to go to theaters and watch 'Avengers' quite so obsessively. Also I draw while watching at home, and that's hard to do in a dark theater. I still want to see it one more time before it goes out of theaters, though.
You know what I didn't notice before watching
(
Read more... )
I think Tony's father issues are probably deep-set enough a part of the character that they won't paper them over in Iron Man III. One hopes, anyway.
Reply
. . whereas Avengers was aimed squarely at the geeks, from its waif-fu hairstyle down to its ittle gov't conspiracy toes. And I <3s it. And the mainstream certainly didn't hate it, so yay for proof that you don't have to make your characters Joe Everyman to make a movie that will appeal to Joe Everyman (I mean, for pete's sake, our intro-to-the-world character is *Natasha* for about the first half of the movie, before she turns that over to Steve).
Reply
It's aimed at blue-collar conservative, I guess I'd say, which is a really interesting target audience for a movie about a character like Tony Stark.
Perhaps Tony Stark represents a flavor of the American Dream, minus, I guess, the pulling yourself up by your bootstraps part--but the material success and the car babes, I guess. At least superficially, he's got an appealing fantasy life. I'm not sure, though--I gotta admit, I don't really understand the desire to be Tony Stark, because even post-Pepper, I am not sure he has a life that would be much fun to actually live. But I don't understand wanting to be a Hollywood star, either, and obviously people do that!
Avengers really did an amazing job at broad appeal, and I'm still puzzling over that a bit, because it is so solidly aimed at geeks and outsiders; I think it's almost the superhero-y-est superhero movie I've seen, and I think there' ( ... )
Reply
Reply
But Tony's flaws and problems are why I find him interesting rather than entirely irritating.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment