Feb 23, 2004 08:51
I've read a lot of shit talking about Nadar's presidentail bid. so let me talk some shit of my own....
Kerry is a moderate demorcat.
let me put this into perspective.
this means that while he is against the Iraq war (wait, or is he....?) he's also very conseravtive when it comes fiscal policy. This means that the whole economic issue MIGHT NOT GET BETTER UNDER KERRY. Just because he calls himself a demorcat doesn't mean he's liberal. He is when you compare him to Bush, in fact next to Bush a lot of people look liberal, including some republicans. Kerry has a history of being very moderate. If you think that Kerry will solve the Bush problem, him might, but i really see this as a 'lesser of two evils' thing again. Look, people, sometimes you have to see that to take some sort of stand against a political system that is bought and sold under a two party system is somthing that won't get any better as long as people show their support for the lesser of two evils. Nadar is and can be a viable 3rd party candidate and as long as i agree with a 3rd party, i will vote for it because fuck the Dems and the 'Publicans. i'm tired of the monopoly and THAT is the reason why our country is so fucked.