department of wtf

Mar 06, 2008 22:57

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said the bombing did not appear to be an act of terrorism but the investigation was in its early stages. (link)
The bombing. Is not terrorism. Er. How would it have not qualified? Was it too small? Was the target insufficiently worthy? Seems to me that if I'd been in the vicinity I'd be pretty frickin' terrified, ( Read more... )

america, terrah

Leave a comment

Comments 3

waidesworld March 7 2008, 00:54:05 UTC
I don't get it. There are a shit load of webcams in the vicinity of T-square yet none caught this act of vandalism in action, or the perps running away. I guess I watch too much Law and Order....

Reply


bitpuddle March 7 2008, 01:39:48 UTC
Because it was done by a white guy on a bicycle. Terrorists are brown and fly airplanes.

Reply


ikkyu2 March 7 2008, 02:58:12 UTC
You're not sufficiently versed in the politics of meaning. Refer to Hilly Clinton's 1994 Wellesley commencement address. The gist of it is, we control teh meanings, we control teh politics.

If they say it's not terrorism, it's not terrorism. Besides, didn't you hear: "All events in future of galaxy hereby arbitrarily ruled 'not terrorism."

Reply


Leave a comment

Up