(Untitled)

[waffleoppolis]

Something somebody said got me thinking today, you know...

If our God gave all people have a little thing called free will, is it the right of his children to presume they know better, and to keep his less enlightened or less fortunate children from exercising that free will?

God's child or a woman's child,
Not your child, not your choice.

Comments

[atwistedshell]

But then again, who are we to presume we have a God?

Could God not be a creature created by men who thought they knew better?

[waffleoppolis]

I assumed a religious perspective here, yes, but if you don't have a God it still works.

Eliminating the God from my message, you're left with it being a woman's child, so unless it is your own, we still have: Not your child, not your choice.

[atwistedshell]

I thought you were trying to say no one should kill a child and destroy that child's free will.

I apologize.

[iamnotsuicidal]

isnt that the point

[anonymous]

Wow, this entry is ridiculously immature. So says Anthony.

[waffleoppolis]

I fail to grasp how my entry is immature, especially when your official response to the matter was "yeah, I wonder about if Hitler had been aborted."

I don't know what it is that gets you, the idea of having a religion and still being a tolerant person, or the idea of a viewpoint that disagrees with yours at all.

Either way, points to you for first on Justine's or mine to lug insults.