2 Anonymous Comments Addressed
"Day has condemned rape on numerous occasions. His argument is that moral relativists have no grounds for condemning rape. Christianity, however, does. Do you try and willfully misrepresent arguments or are you just stupid? I'd love to see how well you do on a reading comprehension test." Anonymous person #1.
I reply as such:
I do not misrepresent anything anyone has said. I read what was written, quote, and reply with my own ideas and opinions. However, I would like to see a place where Mr. Day has clearly and directly condemned rape.
(can anyone say fallacy?)
" You are wrong, mistaken or dishonest. Vox was using heurism. He was speaking heuristically. This is quite different from speaking literally, which is how you interpreted him." Anonymous person #2.
I reply as such:
I interpreted what he flat out said. I don't assume much, except for the meanings of the words that are clearly written.
From, nontheless, anonymous posters. Why not add a name or a letter or do you wish to not be connected to what you preach?
I reply as such:
I do not misrepresent anything anyone has said. I read what was written, quote, and reply with my own ideas and opinions. However, I would like to see a place where Mr. Day has clearly and directly condemned rape.
(can anyone say fallacy?)
" You are wrong, mistaken or dishonest. Vox was using heurism. He was speaking heuristically. This is quite different from speaking literally, which is how you interpreted him." Anonymous person #2.
I reply as such:
I interpreted what he flat out said. I don't assume much, except for the meanings of the words that are clearly written.
From, nontheless, anonymous posters. Why not add a name or a letter or do you wish to not be connected to what you preach?