I'm starting a new comment, so it won't be smushed against the right side of the screen.sammieffpSeptember 10 2006, 22:35:48 UTC
2. Why only potato soup and why only when you are sick? I think it's just a family thing. When I'm sick, we make potato soup.
3. Well, think about what you understand to be learning. Then think whether it is significant, and describe any significance it may have. This seems like such a silly question. I don't even know where to start.
5. How so? It was a joke. That's another one of those, "How do I answer this..?"
6. Why? Are you? Because. And no. I just can't/won't be.
8. How so? Why so? What does this have to do with the question? I'm just a selfish person, therefore it would be a high priority... wait, are you joking? How does this NOT pertain to the question?
9. How so? I've moved several times, and changed schools each time. As soon as I leave, my 'friends' are not so friendly anymore. I do try, but it's hard to keep a friend when they don't find YOU important enough to keep. Bitter, me? Never.
1. Why not? Do you like other sour things? 2. 'Them'? How odd. 3. Well, you couldn't very well say that learning is not important. You learn constantly. There's really no other answer than yours... 7. Why/how so? 8. Then, I'm sorry I type so slowly. ^_^ 9. So friend = acquaintance? I want to talk to everyone, yet they say a friend of everyone is a friend of no one. Do you agree?
Re: I'm starting a new comment, so it won't be smushed against the right side of the screen.volandumSeptember 10 2006, 22:44:43 UTC
Hee!
I think it's just a family thing. When I'm sick, we make potato soup.
Mmm, okay.
This seems like such a silly question. I don't even know where to start.
How does it seem silly? I suggest starting by contemplating the concept of learning.
It was a joke. That's another one of those, "How do I answer this..?"
Well, you could learn about it and formulate a response based on research.
Because. And no. I just can't/won't be.
Because what? How can't you be? Why won't you be?
I'm just a selfish person, therefore it would be a high priority... wait, are you joking? How does this NOT pertain to the question?
Well, you could be selfish and not care about comfort-type issues! Thank you for clarifying.
I've moved several times, and changed schools each time. As soon as I leave, my 'friends' are not so friendly anymore. I do try, but it's hard to keep a friend when they don't find YOU important enough to keep. Bitter, me? Never.
*smiles*
1. Why not? Do you like other sour things? Not in general. 2. 'Them'? How odd. Oops! It. 3. Well, you couldn't very well say that learning is not important. You learn constantly. There's really no other answer than yours... There are! Would you like me to find you some? 7. Why/how so? It would help me deal with people. Not getting angry so easily would be a good start, as would dealing with emotional reactions in a more constructive manner than outright dismissal. 8. Then, I'm sorry I type so slowly. ^_^ *glows* 9. So friend = acquaintance? I want to talk to everyone, yet they say a friend of everyone is a friend of no one. Do you agree? Nope; I don't actively want to talk with all my acquaintances. I disagree - it's an outright contradiction, and in some cases is still meaningful if you use a non-relative definition of "friend".
Re: I'm starting a new comment, so it won't be smushed against the right side of the screen.sammieffpSeptember 10 2006, 22:53:57 UTC
Well, you could learn about it and formulate a response based on research. I know what it is (generally, at least) but it's hard to have an opinion about it. It's not something one can believe or not believe, and it's not something one can like or dislike.
Because what? How can't you be? Why won't you be? I hate everyone. Okay, that's obviously not true, but sometimes...
2. 'Them'? How odd. Oops! It. I just didn't want to correct you and risk being incorrect myself.
3. Well, you couldn't very well say that learning is not important. You learn constantly. There's really no other answer than yours... There are! Would you like me to find you some? Certainly. I'm interested.
7. Why/how so? It would help me deal with people. Not getting angry so easily would be a good start, as would dealing with emotional reactions in a more constructive manner than outright dismissal. I can't imagine you as being one who would be easily angered...
9. So friend = acquaintance? I want to talk to everyone, yet they say a friend of everyone is a friend of no one. Do you agree? Nope; I don't actively want to talk with all my acquaintances. I disagree - it's an outright contradiction, and in some cases is still meaningful if you use a non-relative definition of "friend". I disagree - it's an outright contradiction, and in some cases is still meaningful if you use a non-relative definition of "friend". But what do you call those who are closer to you, then?
Re: I'm starting a new comment, so it won't be smushed against the right side of the screen.volandumSeptember 10 2006, 23:00:26 UTC
I know what it is (generally, at least) but it's hard to have an opinion about it. It's not something one can believe or not believe, and it's not something one can like or dislike.
Actually, you can like it or dislike it. I find the idea rather interesting.
I hate everyone. Okay, that's obviously not true, but sometimes...
Try again!
I just didn't want to correct you and risk being incorrect myself.
Well, have the point anyway!
Certainly. I'm interested.
Here's one - hmmmmm i think (and this is straight off the top of my head) that it allows us to have a greater insight into the world around us and ourselves.
I can't imagine you as being one who would be easily angered...
Deliberate ignorance and stupidity annoys me intensely and rapidly.
But what do you call those who are closer to you, then?
Better friends. It depends on how they are closer - some are trusted (and called such), some adored, some considered wonderful &c.
Re: I'm starting a new comment, so it won't be smushed against the right side of the screen.sammieffpSeptember 10 2006, 23:08:10 UTC
I hate everyone. Okay, that's obviously not true, but sometimes...
Try again!
Make me! I don't want to.
Here's one - hmmmmm i think (and this is straight off the top of my head) that it allows us to have a greater insight into the world around us and ourselves.
Okay, yeah. That's different. You win.
I can't imagine you as being one who would be easily angered...
Deliberate ignorance and stupidity annoys me intensely and rapidly.
Intensely AND rapidly? Scary. *hides*
But what do you call those who are closer to you, then?
Better friends. It depends on how they are closer - some are trusted (and called such), some adored, some considered wonderful &c.
I think you should call them Superfriends. There is no better reward for being a good friend than being awarded the title of Superfriend.
Also, why can't you imagine me as one who would be easily angered?
You seem too calm/nice/kind. I think, without even really knowing you, I admire you and your outlook and your disposition. (You have no idea how naive I feel to be saying that.)
Re: I'm starting a new comment, so it won't be smushed against the right side of the screen.volandumSeptember 10 2006, 23:25:03 UTC
Make me! I don't want to.
Try again! Why not?
Okay, yeah. That's different. You win.
Hee.
Intensely AND rapidly? Scary. *hides*
Really cute!
I think you should call them Superfriends. There is no better reward for being a good friend than being awarded the title of Superfriend.
Hmm, how about getting the chance to die for me?
You seem too calm/nice/kind. I think, without even really knowing you, I admire you and your outlook and your disposition. (You have no idea how naive I feel to be saying that.)
What do I seem to be? What does my outlook seem to be? What does my disposition seem to be?
You may be naive (don't forget that lovely diaeresis) but you are charming too!
Re: I'm starting a new comment, so it won't be smushed against the right side of the screen.sammieffpSeptember 10 2006, 23:33:21 UTC
I don't want to because... I feel stupid. so there.
Getting the chance to die for you- well, okay. I guess. O.o I don't see how that is relevant.
You seem to be... unique, but I'm sure you know that/have heard that/expect that.
I'm curious about what/who you must be in real life. I realize I'll never know, but it's interesting nonetheless.
I could see you as the peaceful guy who always has that dreamy look in his eyes, but I can also see you as a raving lunatic, the guy everyone is afraid of.
Which makes me wonder about your height, for some reason.
Is it bad that I seriously felt a flash of jealousy when you responded to poeticoddity's comment (in my LJ) before you responded to mine?
[Regarding the diaeresis- I have to admit I didn't know what it was called, though I could tell from context- I just don't know how to make that character. I'd have to Google it, and copy and paste...]
Re: I'm starting a new comment, so it won't be smushed against the right side of the screen.volandumSeptember 10 2006, 23:51:36 UTC
I don't want to because... I feel stupid. so there.
Well, you feel stupid already, so what's the problem?
Getting the chance to die for you- well, okay. I guess. O.o I don't see how that is relevant.
Well, it's being very vulnerable to someone, isn't it?
You seem to be... unique, but I'm sure you know that/have heard that/expect that.
Hee! How do I seem to be unique?
I'm curious about what/who you must be in real life. I realize I'll never know, but it's interesting nonetheless.
Well, I can cite references - the words "insane" and "sociopathic" have a habit of turning up. Do you use IM?
I could see you as the peaceful guy who always has that dreamy look in his eyes, but I can also see you as a raving lunatic, the guy everyone is afraid of.
How about both?
Which makes me wonder about your height, for some reason.
175 cm or so.
Is it bad that I seriously felt a flash of jealousy when you responded to poeticoddity's comment (in my LJ) before you responded to mine?
Possibly, but that wouldn't make it problematic.
[Regarding the diaeresis- I have to admit I didn't know what it was called, though I could tell from context- I just don't know how to make that character. I'd have to Google it, and copy and paste...]
Mmm-hmm. Don't confuse those with umlauts, by the way - a diaeresis tells you that a vowel that would normally be read as part of a diphthong - such as the ai in "ain't" is instead read as part of a different syllable - "na/ive".
I think it's just a family thing. When I'm sick, we make potato soup.
3. Well, think about what you understand to be learning. Then think whether it is significant, and describe any significance it may have.
This seems like such a silly question. I don't even know where to start.
5. How so?
It was a joke. That's another one of those, "How do I answer this..?"
6. Why? Are you?
Because. And no. I just can't/won't be.
8. How so? Why so? What does this have to do with the question?
I'm just a selfish person, therefore it would be a high priority... wait, are you joking? How does this NOT pertain to the question?
9. How so?
I've moved several times, and changed schools each time. As soon as I leave, my 'friends' are not so friendly anymore. I do try, but it's hard to keep a friend when they don't find YOU important enough to keep. Bitter, me? Never.
1. Why not? Do you like other sour things?
2. 'Them'? How odd.
3. Well, you couldn't very well say that learning is not important. You learn constantly. There's really no other answer than yours...
7. Why/how so?
8. Then, I'm sorry I type so slowly. ^_^
9. So friend = acquaintance? I want to talk to everyone, yet they say a friend of everyone is a friend of no one. Do you agree?
Reply
I think it's just a family thing. When I'm sick, we make potato soup.
Mmm, okay.
This seems like such a silly question. I don't even know where to start.
How does it seem silly? I suggest starting by contemplating the concept of learning.
It was a joke. That's another one of those, "How do I answer this..?"
Well, you could learn about it and formulate a response based on research.
Because. And no. I just can't/won't be.
Because what? How can't you be? Why won't you be?
I'm just a selfish person, therefore it would be a high priority... wait, are you joking? How does this NOT pertain to the question?
Well, you could be selfish and not care about comfort-type issues! Thank you for clarifying.
I've moved several times, and changed schools each time. As soon as I leave, my 'friends' are not so friendly anymore. I do try, but it's hard to keep a friend when they don't find YOU important enough to keep. Bitter, me? Never.
*smiles*
1. Why not? Do you like other sour things?
Not in general.
2. 'Them'? How odd.
Oops! It.
3. Well, you couldn't very well say that learning is not important. You learn constantly. There's really no other answer than yours...
There are! Would you like me to find you some?
7. Why/how so?
It would help me deal with people. Not getting angry so easily would be a good start, as would dealing with emotional reactions in a more constructive manner than outright dismissal.
8. Then, I'm sorry I type so slowly. ^_^
*glows*
9. So friend = acquaintance? I want to talk to everyone, yet they say a friend of everyone is a friend of no one. Do you agree?
Nope; I don't actively want to talk with all my acquaintances. I disagree - it's an outright contradiction, and in some cases is still meaningful if you use a non-relative definition of "friend".
Reply
I know what it is (generally, at least) but it's hard to have an opinion about it. It's not something one can believe or not believe, and it's not something one can like or dislike.
Because what? How can't you be? Why won't you be?
I hate everyone. Okay, that's obviously not true, but sometimes...
2. 'Them'? How odd.
Oops! It.
I just didn't want to correct you and risk being incorrect myself.
3. Well, you couldn't very well say that learning is not important. You learn constantly. There's really no other answer than yours...
There are! Would you like me to find you some?
Certainly. I'm interested.
7. Why/how so?
It would help me deal with people. Not getting angry so easily would be a good start, as would dealing with emotional reactions in a more constructive manner than outright dismissal.
I can't imagine you as being one who would be easily angered...
9. So friend = acquaintance? I want to talk to everyone, yet they say a friend of everyone is a friend of no one. Do you agree?
Nope; I don't actively want to talk with all my acquaintances. I disagree - it's an outright contradiction, and in some cases is still meaningful if you use a non-relative definition of "friend". I disagree - it's an outright contradiction, and in some cases is still meaningful if you use a non-relative definition of "friend".
But what do you call those who are closer to you, then?
Reply
Actually, you can like it or dislike it. I find the idea rather interesting.
I hate everyone. Okay, that's obviously not true, but sometimes...
Try again!
I just didn't want to correct you and risk being incorrect myself.
Well, have the point anyway!
Certainly. I'm interested.
Here's one -
hmmmmm i think (and this is straight off the top of my head) that it allows us to have a greater insight into the world around us and ourselves.
I can't imagine you as being one who would be easily angered...
Deliberate ignorance and stupidity annoys me intensely and rapidly.
But what do you call those who are closer to you, then?
Better friends. It depends on how they are closer - some are trusted (and called such), some adored, some considered wonderful &c.
Reply
Try again!
Make me! I don't want to.
Here's one -
hmmmmm i think (and this is straight off the top of my head) that it allows us to have a greater insight into the world around us and ourselves.
Okay, yeah. That's different. You win.
I can't imagine you as being one who would be easily angered...
Deliberate ignorance and stupidity annoys me intensely and rapidly.
Intensely AND rapidly? Scary. *hides*
But what do you call those who are closer to you, then?
Better friends. It depends on how they are closer - some are trusted (and called such), some adored, some considered wonderful &c.
I think you should call them Superfriends. There is no better reward for being a good friend than being awarded the title of Superfriend.
Also, why can't you imagine me as one who would be easily angered?
You seem too calm/nice/kind. I think, without even really knowing you, I admire you and your outlook and your disposition. (You have no idea how naive I feel to be saying that.)
Reply
Try again! Why not?
Okay, yeah. That's different. You win.
Hee.
Intensely AND rapidly? Scary. *hides*
Really cute!
I think you should call them Superfriends. There is no better reward for being a good friend than being awarded the title of Superfriend.
Hmm, how about getting the chance to die for me?
You seem too calm/nice/kind. I think, without even really knowing you, I admire you and your outlook and your disposition. (You have no idea how naive I feel to be saying that.)
What do I seem to be? What does my outlook seem to be? What does my disposition seem to be?
You may be naive (don't forget that lovely diaeresis) but you are charming too!
Reply
Getting the chance to die for you- well, okay. I guess. O.o I don't see how that is relevant.
You seem to be... unique, but I'm sure you know that/have heard that/expect that.
I'm curious about what/who you must be in real life. I realize I'll never know, but it's interesting nonetheless.
I could see you as the peaceful guy who always has that dreamy look in his eyes, but I can also see you as a raving lunatic, the guy everyone is afraid of.
Which makes me wonder about your height, for some reason.
Is it bad that I seriously felt a flash of jealousy when you responded to poeticoddity's comment (in my LJ) before you responded to mine?
[Regarding the diaeresis- I have to admit I didn't know what it was called, though I could tell from context- I just don't know how to make that character. I'd have to Google it, and copy and paste...]
Reply
Well, you feel stupid already, so what's the problem?
Getting the chance to die for you- well, okay. I guess. O.o I don't see how that is relevant.
Well, it's being very vulnerable to someone, isn't it?
You seem to be... unique, but I'm sure you know that/have heard that/expect that.
Hee! How do I seem to be unique?
I'm curious about what/who you must be in real life. I realize I'll never know, but it's interesting nonetheless.
Well, I can cite references - the words "insane" and "sociopathic" have a habit of turning up. Do you use IM?
I could see you as the peaceful guy who always has that dreamy look in his eyes, but I can also see you as a raving lunatic, the guy everyone is afraid of.
How about both?
Which makes me wonder about your height, for some reason.
175 cm or so.
Is it bad that I seriously felt a flash of jealousy when you responded to poeticoddity's comment (in my LJ) before you responded to mine?
Possibly, but that wouldn't make it problematic.
[Regarding the diaeresis- I have to admit I didn't know what it was called, though I could tell from context- I just don't know how to make that character. I'd have to Google it, and copy and paste...]
Mmm-hmm. Don't confuse those with umlauts, by the way - a diaeresis tells you that a vowel that would normally be read as part of a diphthong - such as the ai in "ain't" is instead read as part of a different syllable - "na/ive".
Reply
Centimeters? Eek! *converts using calculator*
Much better. :)
Reply
I find Google Calculator useful for that.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment