Livejournal
Log in
Post
Friends
My journal
volandum
Arbitrary matters.
Aug 12, 2006 13:47
I verify
this
and confirm all of it. Those with an interest in my integrity would be advised to read.
Edit: (
Details, details
)
Leave a comment
Next
Back to all threads
sammieffp
September 10 2006, 19:34:14 UTC
I guess I can reply to you here.
Attack my biography? Go ahead. I have no idea what you're talking about, though.
=)
Reply
volandum
September 10 2006, 19:39:49 UTC
Indeed you can!
I like smilies. Thank you.
Bio: So what if I just copied my interests from my first LJ? Don't judge me.
Why do you say "Don't judge me."? Is it a reasonable request?
I claim "no" to the latter - shall I explain?
Reply
sammieffp
September 10 2006, 19:45:23 UTC
Sure.
Reply
volandum
September 10 2006, 19:52:51 UTC
It is unreasonable because it would shut down all conclusive thought about you (any conclusion would be a judgment), which, as you exist, is not particularly helpful.
Reply
sammieffp
September 10 2006, 19:55:22 UTC
I do NOT exist. How dare you imply such a thing!
(...or, should that have a question mark?)
As I was saying, I don't exist. Therefore, I cannot be wrong...
Reply
volandum
September 10 2006, 19:59:24 UTC
That should have a question mark. Or one of those interrobangs.
Aah, but you imply it yourself by acting as yourself. Hee.
Aah, your logic is flawed - all properties can be soundly assigned to something that does not exist, and no properties can be negated.
Reply
sammieffp
September 10 2006, 20:02:22 UTC
I love that word.
No, I do not exist because you are asleep, and-
Fine, I admit it.
You're right; I'm wrong.
Are you happy now?
Pardon me while I cry a little.
^_~
Reply
volandum
September 10 2006, 20:06:05 UTC
Eee, cute! *giggles*
What about that judgment request?
Reply
sammieffp
September 10 2006, 20:09:26 UTC
I don't know what you're talking about.
*shifty eyes*
I never said such a thing, anyway. Go ahead, look.
>=)
Reply
volandum
September 10 2006, 20:11:56 UTC
*giggles*
Should have taken a screenshot.
What are you thinking now?
Reply
sammieffp
September 10 2006, 20:25:27 UTC
Thinking? I never think. How does one think?
How do you think?
Reply
volandum
September 10 2006, 20:29:12 UTC
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=think
One acts to correspond with one of those definitions. You probably manage #1 trivially.
I think curiously!
Reply
sammieffp
September 10 2006, 20:35:22 UTC
Dictionary.com vs. M-W.com
Thoughts?
And while we're on the subject,
v./v vs./v. vs./vs?
Reply
volandum
September 10 2006, 21:07:01 UTC
Both are citable; the former is a metasearch.
I don't quite understand. Please explain.
Reply
sammieffp
September 10 2006, 21:08:26 UTC
Which do you use? (/which SHOULD be used?)
vs. or
vs or
v. or
v?
(I was discussing this in a class a week or two ago, and we never really came to a conclusion.)
Reply
volandum
September 10 2006, 21:12:27 UTC
vs.
It's a stripped contraction of versus and so needs the full stop. The "s" is optional, but I use it to avoid confusion with v.v. (vice versa).
Reply
Back to all threads
Next
Leave a comment
Up
Attack my biography? Go ahead. I have no idea what you're talking about, though.
=)
Reply
I like smilies. Thank you.
Bio: So what if I just copied my interests from my first LJ? Don't judge me.
Why do you say "Don't judge me."? Is it a reasonable request?
I claim "no" to the latter - shall I explain?
Reply
Reply
Reply
(...or, should that have a question mark?)
As I was saying, I don't exist. Therefore, I cannot be wrong...
Reply
Aah, but you imply it yourself by acting as yourself. Hee.
Aah, your logic is flawed - all properties can be soundly assigned to something that does not exist, and no properties can be negated.
Reply
No, I do not exist because you are asleep, and-
Fine, I admit it.
You're right; I'm wrong.
Are you happy now?
Pardon me while I cry a little.
^_~
Reply
What about that judgment request?
Reply
*shifty eyes*
I never said such a thing, anyway. Go ahead, look.
>=)
Reply
Should have taken a screenshot.
What are you thinking now?
Reply
How do you think?
Reply
One acts to correspond with one of those definitions. You probably manage #1 trivially.
I think curiously!
Reply
Thoughts?
And while we're on the subject,
v./v vs./v. vs./vs?
Reply
I don't quite understand. Please explain.
Reply
vs. or
vs or
v. or
v?
(I was discussing this in a class a week or two ago, and we never really came to a conclusion.)
Reply
It's a stripped contraction of versus and so needs the full stop. The "s" is optional, but I use it to avoid confusion with v.v. (vice versa).
Reply
Leave a comment