retouching

Oct 10, 2008 16:53

first i read the story and thought they're crazy, but then i watched (first half) and agree with them



politics

Leave a comment

Comments 13

levik October 11 2008, 00:41:31 UTC
You agree with them that it's the obligation of a news magazine to retouch what's supposed to be a "candid" photograph of a politician?

Reply

vityokr October 11 2008, 00:46:59 UTC
1) front cover closeup of a magazine is not a candid. It's a cover shot. they are always retouched

but that is not even why i think newsweek is wrong -

2) comparing it to the picture of St. Obama which looks much better.

i am not saying this because i like Pallin - it's just being fair. A huge closeup shot of a woman's face on the cover of a magazine is always retouched.

Reply

levik October 11 2008, 00:51:52 UTC
From a May Newsweek article.

Most serious news organizations, including NEWSWEEK, have strict rules against photo manipulation. But for now fashion, women's and lifestyle publications typically honor no such code. They may not admit it outright, but it's common knowledge within the industry that retouching and thinning models and celebrities is not just standard procedure, it's expected and often demanded by publicists. "We're always stretching the models' legs and slimming their thighs," a Manhattan-based photo retoucher tells NEWSWEEK, speaking anonymously for fear of professional backlash. "Sometimes I feel a little like Frankenstein."

Reply

vityokr October 11 2008, 01:05:27 UTC
ok, then they should not print that photo. they should not print a picture of a woman that looks like you are an inch from her face IF they can't shoot it well.
Either do as every magazine in the country and retouch blemishes (this is different from stretchign legs. It's called 'blemish remover' in photoshop. Point and click) or shoot better photos. That's what editors are paid for - to make decisions.
Their decision to print an unfavorable photo is wrong.

Reply


cold_starlight October 11 2008, 09:20:28 UTC
oh, whine-whine, shriek-shriek, they didn't retouch our freaking beauty queen! did you expect any other reaction from fascist channel that Fox News is? i am suprised they even found it newsworthy. do they have NOTHING else to talk about? how about rescent court verdict about Palin? why don't they discuss that instead of unflattering photo?

Reply

vityokr October 11 2008, 09:44:49 UTC
you're missing the point - i did not bring it up to take sides. it's not a political thing for me, i care about photography and think they made a valid point.
i don't like pallin but think she deserves a fair treatment.

Reply

levik October 11 2008, 15:25:44 UTC
... and balanced :)

Reply


innanyc October 11 2008, 18:02:52 UTC
They had less flattering close-ups to choose from.
They did not take a risk of posting them on the cover: http://www.newsweek.com/id/162396

Reply

vityokr October 11 2008, 18:03:54 UTC
those are stills from a video tape. it's very different from photos

Reply


Leave a comment

Up