Two Drabbles!

Apr 22, 2008 20:07

Well, double drabbles.

Title: Gyges
Word Count: 200
Pairing: None
Characters: Adam, and another. It'll come as a huge shock who, I'm sure.
Rating: PG
Summary: Adam gets philosophical with someone unexpected. (I hope unexpected).
Disclaimer: Not mine.

Plato had a bit to say about invisibility )

adam, peter, claude, fic:heroes, fic, plaude

Leave a comment

tessykins April 23 2008, 07:58:29 UTC
Aw, I love Adam's pretentiousness. I'd love to see Claude smack him in the gob.

Reply

visiblemarket April 23 2008, 12:49:12 UTC
Aw, I love Adam's pretentiousness.

I have to admit I love it too...oh, Adam. You're such a fun evil person.

I'd love to see Claude smack him in the gob

Well, there's that. Or the sneak slime hug he so certainly needs.

Thanks for reading!

Reply

tessykins April 24 2008, 03:19:53 UTC
I have to admit I love it too...oh, Adam. You're such a fun evil person.
He is! Eloquent bad guys with messiah complexes are so much more fun than overdone zombies.

Well, there's that. Or the sneak slime hug he so certainly needs.
Having Claude do it is almost more satisfying, which I didn't think was possible.

Reply

visiblemarket April 24 2008, 03:31:03 UTC
He is! Eloquent bad guys with messiah complexes are so much more fun than overdone zombies.

Very true. I hope he sticks around for a while...

Having Claude do it is almost more satisfying, which I didn't think was possible.

Hee. Maybe some one will write that, sometime. Maybe.

Reply

tessykins April 24 2008, 06:50:49 UTC
Very true. I hope he sticks around for a while...
"Villains" would not be complete without him.

Hee. Maybe some one will write that, sometime. Maybe.
*poke* Write it.

Reply

visiblemarket April 24 2008, 15:01:38 UTC
"Villains" would not be complete without him.

Well..."Generations" had very little generations wise. Except for Angela.

*poke* Write it.

I meant someone else.

Reply

tessykins April 25 2008, 02:45:28 UTC
It was more V2: "Daddy Issues" than anything else. Though I'll support anything with Angie in it.

:P

Reply

visiblemarket April 25 2008, 03:18:07 UTC
Angie's quite a lot of woman, isn't she? One of the most interesting people there, and the smartest.

*hint hint*

Reply

tessykins April 25 2008, 14:03:16 UTC
Although how such a smart woman managed to produce Peter, I'll never know.

Go hint someone else.

Reply

visiblemarket April 25 2008, 14:15:19 UTC
It's actually not so absurd; it's almost comparable to Sam and his parents. She knew he was going to, you know, explode, and basically probably let him get away with everything. Which means he didn't exactly grow up and has that kind of dense, I-trust-everyone quality to him.

*sigh* But who else would be capable of making it so good?

Reply

tessykins April 25 2008, 14:50:14 UTC
True. And maybe the yet-unseen Papa Petrelli was kinda dense. Because raising a kid in order to turn him into an atomic bomb is no excuse to raise someone stupid.

Lots of people.

Reply

visiblemarket April 25 2008, 14:53:02 UTC
Well, it kind of is; he was pretty much dispensable.

No one else understands how wonderful Claude and Adam's interaction could be.

Reply

tessykins April 26 2008, 02:32:32 UTC
Still, standards and all that.

You should explain it to people.

Reply

visiblemarket April 26 2008, 02:34:08 UTC
Eh. I can see Papa Petrelli being like: "The boy's an idiot! We should work on that!" but Angie was just like, "Aww, let him be an idiot; he's not going to be around long." And he went along with it, because hey, Angie.

That never seems to work, though.

Reply

tessykins April 26 2008, 11:32:37 UTC
And Peter would use his puppy eyes and Papa Petrelli would be unable to resist. And then he'd love Nathan better.

People just don't get it.

Reply

visiblemarket April 26 2008, 12:48:52 UTC
Well, yeah. Nathan was the much more reliable son.

I don't understand how they couldn't...

Reply


Leave a comment

Up