New clothing line.

Feb 18, 2005 02:40


Read more... )

Leave a comment

ka_pow February 18 2005, 15:27:33 UTC
yeah, it looks good, but the contrast is high and the whites are blown out.

Reply

vincemazzola February 18 2005, 15:42:11 UTC
I didn't know there was a certian way photos should look.

Reply

ohh_turbulence February 18 2005, 15:53:43 UTC
I agree, if it is showing clothes they should have definition in the darks. You might be able to fix it with levels in photoshop. Let me know if you need help.

Reply

vincemazzola February 18 2005, 16:04:24 UTC
haha it's not REALLY part of a clothing line.
Next time I need help with photoshop I will call you Gina.

SIKE!

Reply

ka_pow February 18 2005, 16:07:53 UTC
you me got.

Reply

vincemazzola February 18 2005, 16:13:48 UTC
I am making fun of Gina, not you.

Reply

ka_pow February 18 2005, 16:38:23 UTC
well, for the record i was fooled. but then again, all i know about you is that you are nice and that you can produce 13 bicycles on a moment's notice.

Reply

vincemazzola February 18 2005, 18:52:00 UTC
haha true that!

Reply

ohh_turbulence February 18 2005, 19:32:31 UTC
I didnt mean with photoshop, I meant with PHOTOS but whateves! Fuck you if your gonna be that way, Vince.

Reply

ka_pow February 19 2005, 03:02:36 UTC
only ask gina for help if you want your photos to look like VICE magazine rejects

Reply

ohh_turbulence February 19 2005, 03:03:38 UTC
OUCH!

Reply

fucking_love February 19 2005, 16:37:11 UTC
aren't all of your photos dark?

Reply

ohh_turbulence February 19 2005, 19:12:32 UTC
Haha.

Reply

ka_pow February 18 2005, 16:07:22 UTC
for the purpose of showing the clothing, yes, there is a way they should look. i'm not critiquing your artistic vision. i just want to see the clothing.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up