Writer's Block: Significant Choices

[viktoriavampyr]

Okay, for starters, I've never had a significant other in all of my 14 years, which is pretty sad, though I know vaguely what it is like, but I would have to say my friends, because they can't cheat, but then again, your significant other cares for you far more deeply than is normal, so I'm undecided...

That was weird...

Comments

[claire_chan]

I may be just an anonymous text-collection on the Interwebs, but I didn't have a serious significant other until I was 16, so I don't think it's that sad. You have hope! Plenty of people don't interact so intimately until they're older. /20 now, constant ldr's and the one she stopped being an ldr with a brief set of rl interactions in which she had the realisation he wasn't all that + bag of Lays Sour Cream & Onion

Shortly I'm going to see if I've got a male who is all that + a bag of Lays Salt & Vinegar or not. I don't doubt it; I like S&V daresay better than SC&O. Pending, shall know in a little under two months. (Ee, international travel!)

One could have the requirement for being a s.o. be that there should be no cheating! A signed covenant denying cheating and/or whatever else you want to deny. I have not had such a requirement with my own and he has not told me about being "Out n About" as it were. I imagine he could probably pull off a hidden s.o. or a liaison with someone else very well (gender ambiguous; we're both okay with homosexuality, just happen to be opposite genders), but I don't want to depress myself or be especially paranoid. Let me live in my fantasy world a little, ja know? Besides, all evidence points to his only being out with me (i.e. on Facebook).

*$.02* I apologise if my abbreviations were confusing and also that a completely random Queen's-English-spelling-yet-still-American stranger marched into your LJ.