Are you really asking me for my opinion, or do you just want to see if I act any different than usual? What am I even supposed to say about a simple percentage? The other teams have just as much chances of being moles, so that's just it. It's a percentage. But it's like Lambda said- you won't believe us if we just say "we're sheeps", and I'm not sure whose side you're on, either. You're hard to read! I'm not going to trust you easily at all.
With the first two clues, I thought for sure we had to have caught at least one of the agents but it looks like we haven't. It's hard to say who the two are- all I can say for now is that it'd be best if all the sheep picked a set of clue and stuck with it. Right now things are just messy...
I know that if you were a W.O.L.F., you'd be able to look perfectly innocent to everyone.
... honestly, I'm not really sure. Lambda's a lot better at this than me, and the other guy looks a lot less suspicious. But if you're asking me to go on instinct, then I... don't think it's you.
Ugh, but it's just like I said. You're hard to read! So I keep going back and forth, and it's really frustrating.
But allow me to put forth a hypothesis on the moles.
If you consider that of the three options, two benefit sheep, you can have several scenarios.
1) I am a sheep, and you are either a wolf-agent helping the sheep or the actual sheep. Then we can work together in eliminating the other W.O.L.F
2) I am a W.O.L.F, and you are either a wolf-agent helping the sheep or the actual sheep. I cannot take out a fellow wolf, and there are other, safer sheep that should technically be eliminated first.
3) I am a sheep, and you're the sheep-agent working with the W.O.L.F. It would be my word against yours.
4) I am a W.O.L.F, and you're the sheep-agent working with the W.O.L.F. Again, there are other, safer sheep that should technically be eliminated first, and coordination would occur in terms of voting.
The best case scenarios would be 1 and 4, of course.
Hey, don't take it so personally! You're a jerk... sometimes, I guess. But I do have complete faith in you and Tiger when it comes to work. Here it's just a glitter bomb whatever happens- if our lives were on the line, I'd trust you easily. You are a hero, after all.
One and four would mean we'd be able to work together. But we can't even consider that unless both of us are sure we can trust the other in this game. I told you what I think of your team. So what are your thoughts on mine and Lambda's? Are you really that sure we're moles?
Sounds like a stupid thing to do if you ask me. It's not like anyone would just believe you saying "I'm a sheep!". So what's the point in attacking what's just a theory?
So, is that a confession to being a wolf, Pretty Boy?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Firstly with the two W.O.L.F agents that are in both clues, and your thoughts on the moles and of course, your team having a 66% chance of being one.
Reply
With the first two clues, I thought for sure we had to have caught at least one of the agents but it looks like we haven't. It's hard to say who the two are- all I can say for now is that it'd be best if all the sheep picked a set of clue and stuck with it. Right now things are just messy...
Reply
Reply
... honestly, I'm not really sure. Lambda's a lot better at this than me, and the other guy looks a lot less suspicious. But if you're asking me to go on instinct, then I... don't think it's you.
Ugh, but it's just like I said. You're hard to read! So I keep going back and forth, and it's really frustrating.
Reply
Reply
If you consider that of the three options, two benefit sheep, you can have several scenarios.
1) I am a sheep, and you are either a wolf-agent helping the sheep or the actual sheep. Then we can work together in eliminating the other W.O.L.F
2) I am a W.O.L.F, and you are either a wolf-agent helping the sheep or the actual sheep. I cannot take out a fellow wolf, and there are other, safer sheep that should technically be eliminated first.
3) I am a sheep, and you're the sheep-agent working with the W.O.L.F. It would be my word against yours.
4) I am a W.O.L.F, and you're the sheep-agent working with the W.O.L.F. Again, there are other, safer sheep that should technically be eliminated first, and coordination would occur in terms of voting.
The best case scenarios would be 1 and 4, of course.
Reply
One and four would mean we'd be able to work together. But we can't even consider that unless both of us are sure we can trust the other in this game. I told you what I think of your team. So what are your thoughts on mine and Lambda's? Are you really that sure we're moles?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
And we've both been very... selective of our answers and queries as to not eliminate the third option.
Reply
So, is that a confession to being a wolf, Pretty Boy?
Reply
Leave a comment