Damn it, I just found out that as of Dec 31st 2007 you will have to have a passport to inter Mexico or Canada, or maybe back in, (for driving) the end of 2006 for flying, whatever
( Read more... )
The real point that I'm getting to is that every society needs a subservient class. A class, in which the pay is considerably lower, compared to ideas of the norm, to give the said society a boost in the middle class numbers. Most upper classes in the past used such devices as slavery and serfdom; what I'm really suggesting is that illegal immigration starts to fit into that mold. I don't think any sort of preferential treatment should be given to people that are not legally residents by any country; there is no vested interest for that government to do so. I believe it is the responsibility of the government to which a person belongs to make there citizen’s lives better (and I’m not referring to any form of humanitarian aid). If the government of a particular people can not help there people, then in my opinion, that government should be absolved by whatever means necessary.
You no what, let me get to the basics. I'll just state my general ideology and assume that you can figure the rest out.
1.) I believe that societies basically exist for one reason; proper distribution of resources. Some would make arguments about war like cultures; however the only societies I know of that were war like, i.e. nomadic hunters, still were initially formed so that the tribe could survive by having enough hunters.
2.) I believe that every government that has existed and does exist wrongly distributes it's resources. For example tons of corn every year is converted into popcorn, and yet people still starve to death; and yes they starve to death in this country. I assure you that there are other instances of this kind of issue; I just really don't fill like making a check list at the moment.
3.) I believe that with the proper application of existing technology and proper distribution of resources world wide would could easily make the air cleaner, insure we have enough oxygen in the future period, allow the world to feed everyone, allow us to have stores of food in case of any unforeseen circumstances, give people more alternatives in there day to day lives, and just in general give them a little more breathing room; and if we initiated this simultaneously across the world I believe all of these things could be achieved within our life time.
4.) I do believe that some sort of population control system is necessary in society when the birth rate exceeds the death rate for extended period of time. I believe that there will be spikes in the birth rate and in the death rate over time; but the idea is to have the equation balance out to zero.
5.) I believe that some times things will naturally work themselves out and at other times we must call for humanitarian intervention
6.) I believe that all countries should be interlinked; however I do not believe that they should be interlinked by a government. I suspect the best current example of what the interlinking should be like is the EU; however I do not believe that the EU is the interlink necessary for our world.
7.) I believe that “6.)” would cut down on war.
8.) I really do believe these things could make the would a better place and I sincerely would attempt to do what it would take to achieve these goals; however I honestly wouldn't know how to achieve those goals.
Anyway the point of all that was to express my core values, goals, designs, or desires for the world or whatever. It was really just to show my stance in certain regards just to show were I'm coming from on certain issues.
One basic belief I do have that effects and maybe even counters my other beliefs, is that as long as there are multiple countries that any individual country has the right to do whatever it decides best so long as that does not effect any other country. When I say this I do not mean that a country may not do something because it may affect another country. I believe that restrictions should only be placed on countries when it will have a detrimental effect on another country, not which may.
You no what, let me get to the basics. I'll just state my general ideology and assume that you can figure the rest out.
1.) I believe that societies basically exist for one reason; proper distribution of resources. Some would make arguments about war like cultures; however the only societies I know of that were war like, i.e. nomadic hunters, still were initially formed so that the tribe could survive by having enough hunters.
2.) I believe that every government that has existed and does exist wrongly distributes it's resources. For example tons of corn every year is converted into popcorn, and yet people still starve to death; and yes they starve to death in this country. I assure you that there are other instances of this kind of issue; I just really don't fill like making a check list at the moment.
3.) I believe that with the proper application of existing technology and proper distribution of resources world wide would could easily make the air cleaner, insure we have enough oxygen in the future period, allow the world to feed everyone, allow us to have stores of food in case of any unforeseen circumstances, give people more alternatives in there day to day lives, and just in general give them a little more breathing room; and if we initiated this simultaneously across the world I believe all of these things could be achieved within our life time.
4.) I do believe that some sort of population control system is necessary in society when the birth rate exceeds the death rate for extended period of time. I believe that there will be spikes in the birth rate and in the death rate over time; but the idea is to have the equation balance out to zero.
5.) I believe that some times things will naturally work themselves out and at other times we must call for humanitarian intervention
6.) I believe that all countries should be interlinked; however I do not believe that they should be interlinked by a government. I suspect the best current example of what the interlinking should be like is the EU; however I do not believe that the EU is the interlink necessary for our world.
7.) I believe that “6.)” would cut down on war.
8.) I really do believe these things could make the would a better place and I sincerely would attempt to do what it would take to achieve these goals; however I honestly wouldn't know how to achieve those goals.
Anyway the point of all that was to express my core values, goals, designs, or desires for the world or whatever. It was really just to show my stance in certain regards just to show were I'm coming from on certain issues.
One basic belief I do have that effects and maybe even counters my other beliefs, is that as long as there are multiple countries that any individual country has the right to do whatever it decides best so long as that does not effect any other country. When I say this I do not mean that a country may not do something because it may affect another country. I believe that restrictions should only be placed on countries when it will have a detrimental effect on another country, not which may.
Reply
Leave a comment