да, но "обычно" не ознчает, что него в договоре это было, тоебуется суд;-) А вообще описанный случай и есть типичный пример "крисиза либерализма". - который лежит в самой основе преимущества этой социальной модели Новообще-то имено кризисы и позволяют определить устойчивость и "осмысленности" имеющейся системы администрирования срциального поведений. именно неизбежные "кризисы роста" в изменяющизся условиях и заставляют его проявиться. Если государство реагирует на него - запускается процесс последующих социальных мер, принимаемых государственным аппаратом для решения этой проблемы и показывает насколько новый процесс был подходящ для достижения этой цели. Раз и навсегда ничего установить нельзя - хотя стратегию направления изменений, которые должны произойти, подобрать можно. 2 Chaos Theory and Strategic Thought. STEVEN R. MANN http://www.researchgate.net/publication/235215110_Chaos_Theory_and_Strategic_Thought
...Amid the disorder, we are not bereft of strategy. Criticality theory is not a limitation for the strategist but a promising framework which helps explicate the fascinating disorder of the world. Once we arrive at an accurate description of our environment, we are in a position to create strategies which advance our interests. To create these strategies, we must begin with an examination of the factors which shape criticality. Some possibilities:
• Initial shape of the system
• Underlying structure of the system
• Cohesion among the actors
• Conflict energy of the individual actors
Taking these factors one by one: The initial shape, that is, the contours of a system at the beginning, influence the system's later development: the post-catastrophic outcome forms the basis of subsequent actions. In our sandpile, the post-avalanche slopes and hills influence the shape of the new cone to be formed; in foreign affairs, the changed boundaries after World War II could not help shaping the subsequent course of events. Again, in sandpile terms, the grains fall onto a flat, circular surface: this is the underlying structure. This basic structure, or matrix, helps determine the shape of the developing sandpile. In the international sense, underlying structure can be factors such as environment and geography. (Real-politics example Kuwait's operation) each actor in politically critical systems possesses conflict energy, an active force that instigates change in the status quo, thus contributing to the formation of the critical state. In our international system, this energy derives from the motivations, values, and capabilities of the specific actors, whether governments, political or religious movements, or individuals. These actors can seek change in the status quo through peaceful or violent means, but either conrse inches the state of affairs toward its date with criticality and the inevitable cataclysmic reordering. Chaos theory dictates that it is very difficult to make long-range predictious. The difficulty increases with the number of actors in the system and the duration of forecast desired. As a starting point, therefore, we should be suspicious of long-term strategic outlooks.
Новообще-то имено кризисы и позволяют определить устойчивость и "осмысленности" имеющейся системы администрирования срциального поведений. именно неизбежные "кризисы роста" в изменяющизся условиях и заставляют его проявиться. Если государство реагирует на него - запускается процесс последующих социальных мер, принимаемых государственным аппаратом для решения этой проблемы и показывает насколько новый процесс был подходящ для достижения этой цели. Раз и навсегда ничего установить нельзя - хотя стратегию направления изменений, которые должны произойти, подобрать можно.
2 Chaos Theory and Strategic Thought. STEVEN R. MANN
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/235215110_Chaos_Theory_and_Strategic_Thought
...Amid the disorder, we are not bereft of strategy. Criticality theory is
not a limitation for the strategist but a promising framework which helps
explicate the fascinating disorder of the world. Once we arrive at an accurate
description of our environment, we are in a position to create strategies which
advance our interests. To create these strategies, we must begin with an
examination of the factors which shape criticality. Some possibilities:
• Initial shape of the system
• Underlying structure of the system
• Cohesion among the actors
• Conflict energy of the individual actors
Taking these factors one by one:
The initial shape, that is, the contours of a system at the beginning,
influence the system's later development: the post-catastrophic outcome forms
the basis of subsequent actions. In our sandpile, the post-avalanche slopes and
hills influence the shape of the new cone to be formed; in foreign affairs, the
changed boundaries after World War II could not help shaping the subsequent
course of events.
Again, in sandpile terms, the grains fall onto a flat, circular surface:
this is the underlying structure. This basic structure, or matrix, helps determine
the shape of the developing sandpile. In the international sense, underlying
structure can be factors such as environment and geography.
(Real-politics example Kuwait's operation)
each actor in politically critical systems possesses conflict
energy, an active force that instigates change in the status quo, thus contributing
to the formation of the critical state. In our international system, this energy
derives from the motivations, values, and capabilities of the specific actors,
whether governments, political or religious movements, or individuals. These
actors can seek change in the status quo through peaceful or violent means, but
either conrse inches the state of affairs toward its date with criticality and the
inevitable cataclysmic reordering.
Chaos theory dictates that it is very difficult to make long-range
predictious. The difficulty increases with the number of actors in the system
and the duration of forecast desired. As a starting point, therefore, we should
be suspicious of long-term strategic outlooks.
Reply
Leave a comment