Apr 14, 2008 11:14
What is up with the burly detectivism in Tin Man? Never have I encountered a fandom so dead set on replacing characters' names and pronouns with ridiculous sounding proxies. And passive voice! With a verb that takes an object! How can that even sound right to an author?
ETA: Ye gods and little fishes! *stares at ballooning comments*
fandom,
tin man,
fic,
grammar
Leave a comment
Unless it's the tightness of Cain's pants. That can never be overstated.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Ahh, dyslexia. The refuge of the lazy. I would love to see a throw-down between a "dyslexic" and a real dyslexic. Most of the dyslexics I know have sweated blood to hone word-perfect diction and are thrown into a frothing rage when they encounter the "I'm learning disabled. I shouldn't be expected to tryyyyy" canard.
Reply
But I have had many students who really did not get any grammar in school. I teach Latin and I frequently get students who have no idea how to find the subject or object in a sentence. I got very little English grammar myself growing up and learned most of it in French class and later in Latin. I wind up teaching them English grammar just so they can make sense of Latin.
I can also say that, at least at certain institutions *cough*, the trend in teaching college-level English composition is to focus on self-expression rather than on correct grammar.
Reply
Reply
I suppose it's possible that some of them didn't get exposed to grammar in school, but again, I suspect that for most of them, it was simply a case of not finding it important enough to retain. I can remember covering the same grammar information from the previous year at the beginning of the new one, and people who were in my class the last year acted as though it was something they'd never heard of before.
I got very little English grammar myself growing up and learned most of it in French class and later in Latin.
Very odd. My school system was far from perfect, but English class included grammar instruction every single year.
Reply
My experience should be odd, but it wasn't when I was in school. It was the 1970's! We learned to feel good about ourselves! We all got rainbows and kittens and unicorns! Grammar - not so much. And I learned an awful lot of my pitiful quotient of American history by listening to radio contests during the Bicentennial.
(Also not much geography for some reason. When I started watching Rat Patrol, I had no idea that Libya is immediately west of Egypt. Fandom has been very good for my geography, right up there with Carmen Sandiego.)
Reply
Also, it may be that some states have been less than vigilant about including grammar in their curriculum requirements. It's hard for me to imagine anyone putting together such requirements without including at least rudimentary grammar study, but I guess it must be happening somewhere.
Reply
*nod nod* My husband grew up in a small city in Wisconsin, which was similarly "behind" - he got a much better primary and secondary education than I did in many areas.
Also, it may be that some states have been less than vigilant about including grammar in their curriculum requirements.My first high school was in California, my second, in Maryland. I'm not sure about the grammar curriculum, but on the whole, CA's standards were much more lax than MD's, and I spent my last two years of high school catching up. Fortunately not as much as I might have, since my parents weren't willing to let me take the minimum ( ... )
Reply
I wasn't taught grammar until my first AP English course, and even the teacher wasn't quite sure what she was doing. I know for a fact that no other class was taught a single thing about grammar. It wasn't even touched on in the second AP English course.
It may depend on the state, perhaps? I'm in Colorado and know for a fact that East Coast schools blow us out of the water in...well. Just about everything but hockey! We're good at hockey.
Reply
I used to teach Greek in an expensive private East Coast college, and while my students were the cream of the crop, they still didn't have much of a grasp of English grammar. They were the kind of kids who write correctly purely by osmosis, if you know what I mean; they had read enough good literature that they understood implicitly how to compose a sentence. I asked them once, point-blank, "Why don't you know this stuff? You're the smart ones!"
And they explained that their fellow high school students did study grammar, but they had gone into AP courses where they only read literature - no grammar. *foreheadsmack*
Reply
Reply
I'll admit I'm probably an 'osmosis' writer, although I, um. I kind of stole my teacher's grammar book? BUT I GAVE HER MY 'MY LITTLE PONIES' SO SHE DIDN'T NOTICE! And then it was just TRADE!
Reply
Reply
So what did you guys do in English class in grades three through twelve? I mean, kids aren't learning to write, they aren't learning to speak, they aren't learning to spell... what the heck are English teachers writing lesson plans around?
Reply
Leave a comment