Help Fight Directive 51: Keep Bush Out
"Many have not heard of Directive 51, as i had no idea what it was
until today. It was something that came up back on May 9th, and
despite it's importance, there was not any press coverage on it
whatsoever. The Directive, which seems disturbingly similar to
something that Hitler passed essentially says that, In the case of a
catastrophic emergancy in which a large amount of casulties and damage
is incured, the President will "Lead the houses" through the emergancy
[IE Dictate], until the disaster is over. This includes, if such an
incident occurs say, 5 days before the election. He will STAY in
office until the emergancy is deemed "over".
The disaster can be amongst a large array of events, from natural
disasters, to technology/terroristic happenings such as 9/11. If,
there were ever a time in which 9/11 conspiracy theorists had a moment
to yell, this would be it. But oddly, they are silent. Why is this?
I'll tell you why, they purposely decided to stay on the downlow about
this. However, covering their bases, it is posted on the
whitehouse.gov site. I've covered the most disturbing part, but
there's alot more. Essentially, the "Directive" nullifies the three
branches of the government, and subsidizes them into a dictatorship.
What are the leading democrats saying? NOTHING! They've FALLEN ASLEEP
AT THE [wide range of obscenities deleted] WHEEL! No one is saying a
damn thing!
If i could, i'd go to a democratic debate, and i'd ASK all of the
potential presidential canidates what their stances on Directive 51
is, and what they've done to stop it. If they don't answer, or don't
know what it is, SCREW THEM! They are UNFIT for president. I don't
care if they're democrats.
And if such incident happens, say, just before the elections? Then
i'll be DAMNED if I let this country become a dictatorship. And
everyone whom read this should be damned too! There should be protests
with which would utterly DWARF all the protests in Europe right now
and in the past.
Enlighten yourself, read the directive, come to your own conclusion:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html
[not so legal translation for those who do not want to go through the
legal wording of the first link:]
http://www.progressive.org/mag_wx051807"
until today. It was something that came up back on May 9th, and
despite it's importance, there was not any press coverage on it
whatsoever. The Directive, which seems disturbingly similar to
something that Hitler passed essentially says that, In the case of a
catastrophic emergancy in which a large amount of casulties and damage
is incured, the President will "Lead the houses" through the emergancy
[IE Dictate], until the disaster is over. This includes, if such an
incident occurs say, 5 days before the election. He will STAY in
office until the emergancy is deemed "over".
The disaster can be amongst a large array of events, from natural
disasters, to technology/terroristic happenings such as 9/11. If,
there were ever a time in which 9/11 conspiracy theorists had a moment
to yell, this would be it. But oddly, they are silent. Why is this?
I'll tell you why, they purposely decided to stay on the downlow about
this. However, covering their bases, it is posted on the
whitehouse.gov site. I've covered the most disturbing part, but
there's alot more. Essentially, the "Directive" nullifies the three
branches of the government, and subsidizes them into a dictatorship.
What are the leading democrats saying? NOTHING! They've FALLEN ASLEEP
AT THE [wide range of obscenities deleted] WHEEL! No one is saying a
damn thing!
If i could, i'd go to a democratic debate, and i'd ASK all of the
potential presidential canidates what their stances on Directive 51
is, and what they've done to stop it. If they don't answer, or don't
know what it is, SCREW THEM! They are UNFIT for president. I don't
care if they're democrats.
And if such incident happens, say, just before the elections? Then
i'll be DAMNED if I let this country become a dictatorship. And
everyone whom read this should be damned too! There should be protests
with which would utterly DWARF all the protests in Europe right now
and in the past.
Enlighten yourself, read the directive, come to your own conclusion:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html
[not so legal translation for those who do not want to go through the
legal wording of the first link:]
http://www.progressive.org/mag_wx051807"