This interview in Times Online with Mark Constantine, head of Lush cosmetics, made me sort of roll my eyes.
The article says:
"He’s a vegetarian, but wears leather shoes. “I’m the ultimate compromise person, aren’t I? But that’s the point: everyone compromises and, to be honest, those who don’t, you don’t want to be with. We have to do our bit,
(
Read more... )
I'm a flawed vegetarian so I don't make pronouncements that claim I am otherwise ^^;; However, I think that avoiding leather shoes is not that difficult so I don't understand why one does.
I'm curious as to whether there is a negative or positive effect of the whole hectoring/lecturing issue. If vegans were more supportive of nonvegans, I wonder if there would be a different outcome, what do you think?
Reply
I agree with him in that "hectoring/lecturing" is annoying, but I am concerned that too often taking a strong ethical stance (like veganism) is equated with hectoring. It isn't the same thing, but it is often touted as such by people with sort of dodgy double standards like Constantine - probably as a way of throwing focus off their actions and onto the NASTY LECTURING VEGANS WITH THEIR NASTY HOLIER THAN THOU FACEZ. It works pretty well, too.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Fuck that argument. I say lecture and heckle when appropriate. I'm not going to shut up and be quiet just because people don't like what I have to say. Fuck them.
Anyway. I almost never talk about my veganism until some dumb meat-eater starts fucking with me about what I'm eating.
Reply
Leave a comment