Oct 05, 2009 16:41
So a war memorial in southern Cali. was ordered by a federal judge that it needed to be covered due to the fact that it is in the shape of a cross and the memorial put up 75 years ago by said wars veterans is on federal land. The question in discussion is if some one has a right to bring such things to court.
It is my firm belief that this crap is going way to freakin far. I really think that this is more about "how can I sue somebody for something" than "I am offended by the depiction of a cross." I mean seriously folks, are we soon to stop people from wearing crosses in fedral buildings, or penticales in court, of stars of david on public streets cause well those are owner by the government?
Soon some jack ass is going to decide the they are offended by the letter "t" cause it looks like a cross. "shhh here come Bill, don't cross your t's you'll lose your house!" Spanking begets more violence? Well you know what, it also helped to curb stupidity! I firmly believe there would be less bullshit law suits and bullshit people if there had been more spankings. Beating your child is wrong spanking your child is responsible.
Thank you this has been Brian's "ignorant rant" Not religious, just ranty