Oxford future fees: Ouch

Mar 15, 2011 17:42

2012 FeesHousehold incomeTuition charge for first year of studyTuition charge for subsequent years£0 - £16,000£3,500£6,000£16,001 - £20,000£7,000£7,000£20,001 - £25,000£8,000£8,000£25,001 - £9,000£9,000
"In summary, Council has approved a sliding scale of tuition charges, from £3,500 to £9,000 a year, depending on household income, and payable ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

highfantastical March 15 2011, 19:01:08 UTC
...and of course, no account taken at all of factors affecting graduate earning potential.

So I would be owing £36,000 right now. Whilst not knowing if I will ever be able to work, let alone full-time. Would an English degree - even an English degree from Oxford; even a very good English degree from Oxford - be worth that? I don't even know.

And that no additional debt for living costs - which in reality I do have, only my parents could probably have paid that, instead of me having a loan, if they'd had to. But while we are not at all poor, they don't have £36,000 lying about to pay the fees. I can hardly imagine how rich you'd have to be to have that for each child, just...spare money.

It makes me so angry and miserable. :(

Reply

vampire_kitten March 15 2011, 20:41:40 UTC
I'm £16k in student loans dept with no obvious likelihood of paying anywhere near interest in the forseeable future. And that was only paying £1k in fees a year with lowered rents!

Reply

footnotetoplato March 16 2011, 12:04:32 UTC
But there's a *lot* of account taken of graduate earning potential! You never pay anything until you earn over £21,000 (in the vicinity of mean income), and then it's just a graduate tax on amounts over that £21,000, with the exception that if you pay enough you can eventually be exempt. But lots of people (about half) are expected not to have to pay it all before it gets cancelled after thirty years ( ... )

Reply

highfantastical March 16 2011, 14:16:56 UTC
But there's a *lot* of account taken of graduate earning potential!

Um, a system which completely ignores the impact of factors such as disability is not taking a lot of account of variations in earning potential.

Reply

footnotetoplato March 16 2011, 14:41:43 UTC
Okay, so it doesn't try to do any calculation of earning potential. Instead it bases itself -- very strongly and directly -- on something which is well correlated with with earning potential: earnings ( ... )

Reply

highfantastical March 16 2011, 16:08:46 UTC
Our whole society is pretty bad in its approach to disability, but this isn't one of the problems.

Speaking as, er, a person with disabilities....it really is. The less assured one feels about one's earning potential or general financial security, the more oppressive and alarming such high levels of debt are, whether prospectively or retrospectively.

For you, it's a question of imagining what it would be like not to be well enough to work. But I actually am not well enough to work, owe over twenty thousand pounds, and believe me, it is nothing like as easy to cope with as you think.

Reply

footnotetoplato March 16 2011, 16:41:34 UTC
So the problem is, again, perception of the system rather than the actual system.

This really doesn't function like debt, which is why it's so unhelpful that it's labelled as such. People have a reasonable fear of debt. But the problem with debt is that it is problematic if you can't pay it back, and it can affect your credit rating, etc. None of that applies here.

I'm sorry to hear that you're not well enough to work, and I'm sorry that you find your financial situation hard to cope with (although, was this a student loan? If so I'd make the same point that you shouldn't treat it like debt, even if it's less progressive than the proposed system in that the earning threshold is £15,000).

I find your assumptions about me kind of patronising, though.

Reply

highfantastical March 16 2011, 17:08:55 UTC
I find your mansplaining patronising: I got your point the first time, I just happen to think you're wrong.

You said this:

if I were not well enough to work (or to work full time), then I would not owe anything

I don't see how interpreting an 'if...then' statement as indicating that something is not actually the case for you right now is a particularly egregious assumption. Of course it's impossible for me to know every detail of your private situation with regard to work, health, disability, etc. - but your easy dismissal of what I'm telling you (all of which stems from extensive personal experience of disability), leads me to believe that you are unlikely to have had similar experience. Though of course I could be wrong.

I am not asking for you to declare abled/disabled status, only pointing out that what you're saying sounds as though it comes from a position of immense abled privilege. (Even if it actually doesn't.) I think you could use a privilege check on this issue ( ... )

Reply

vampire_kitten March 16 2011, 17:32:27 UTC
Kids, I think I'll call a holt to this discussion now as I know enough about both of you to know you are both getting each other's backs up. If you want to carry on, I suggest taking it elsewhere?

Reply

highfantastical March 16 2011, 18:38:51 UTC
Sure, absolutely - sorry we were arguing in your journal.

Reply

footnotetoplato March 16 2011, 17:40:46 UTC
OK, sorry, I see now how that's a natural way to read what I said ( ... )

Reply

highfantastical March 16 2011, 18:38:19 UTC
Yeah, passions running high on this topic is natural. Sorry we got embroiled in argument - I'll leave it now as A. suggests. I totally get now that you were speaking in good faith.

Reply

vampire_kitten March 16 2011, 17:33:10 UTC
Kids, I think I'll call a holt to this discussion now as I know enough about both of you to know you are both getting each other's backs up. If you want to carry on, I suggest taking it elsewhere?

Reply

footnotetoplato March 16 2011, 17:42:13 UTC
OK, sorry, I posted one more comment before I noticed this.

Reply

vampire_kitten March 18 2011, 11:42:18 UTC
No worries, I just knew I wouldn't have reliable internet until now and I didn't want flare-ups to come back to :)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up