Why is evolution a lie?

Jan 11, 2005 17:20

I was looking up some forums today and I found this question posted...

You know me I can't help but stick my nose into these type of questions. So this is how it went.

~serratedkatana
Subject: Why is Evolution a Lie? (#6439383)
Date: Jan 2, 2005, 12:56:55 AM
I'm curious about this. Since evolution is a theory that makes so much sense, why do creationists continue to call it 'lies' and 'propoganda'?

I want someone who really knows what they're talking about to tell me how and why evolution isn't a possible explanation for all for the life on this planet. i don't want some uninformed cheerleaders to waste my time. You know who you are, and that's why I didn't post this in the 'politics' section.

Think you can help me out?

My Reply:

The THEORY of eveolution is one based on chance. By chance the sun was positioned perfectly from the earth to support life. By chance life came from an extremly concentrated ball of dust, and only happened to exist on one planet *as far as we know*. By chance humans evolved from monkeys and no other animal ever evolved into a being with a fraction of the intelligence that humans have. By chance the earth is the only known planet to be created with an atmosphere to support human life and protect us from things like meteors and comets. By chance Our bodies were evolved so intricately and perfectly in that our organs, muscles, bones work together so that we can appreciated every aspect of life on earth.

We can't just hope that a house will evolve from the dirt, so why does it make sense that something so complex and beautiful as something like the human body came from nothing. Evolution has not been proven and until it is, which I feel will never happen because there is already too much evidence of creation, I will remain a creationist. And like Ultranics-comics said in a way, don't be hatin lol. Evolutionists are just as obstinant about their beliefs as creationists are. I know for a fact some evolutionists are evolutionists because they wouldn't want to answer to a higher authority.

I thought it was cool that another witness (Ultranics-comics)replied to the same post. This is what he had to say.

"Well, if they're going to disbelieve no matter what, then they might as well use PRATT arguments in order to look like fools they claim us to be."

Fools? You hold about as much respect to us creationist as we do to you evolutionists. If you weren’t always trying to refute the existence of a divine creator, we might be slightly more flexible on the topic. But the same could be said for certain over zealous creationists.

This spiral of hate and mockery goes full circle my friend. Your kind has just as many PRATT arguments against us as we have against yours. I’m not saying that’s a good thing or a valid excuse for argument, my point is that evolutionists can be just as uneducated as some newbie creationists

Until the day that one can successfully conduct a scientific experiment with heated water and electricity, and produce more then just some obscure gelatinous goo, evolution will never be proven absolute. We on the other hand harbor a concept called “faith”, a concept moreover, that’s compactly obscure and illogical to evolutionists.
Previous post Next post
Up