010 | Goldenrod City | Text

Oct 23, 2011 20:55

When posed the question, "which contributes more to personality - nature or nurture?", a psychologist once replied, "which contributes more to the area of a rectangle - its length or its width?" The simplistic answer, therefore, is that neither one contributes more to a creature's personality; rather, that it's some interdependent combination of ( Read more... )

mad pokemon breeding science, always glorious always victorious, shut up hannibal no one cares, charming disarming and quite alarming, trying to catch me writing nerdy, let's get philosophical, there's an ulterior motive actually, i am fifteen and what is this, no really i'm the responsible one, ▶ goldenrod city, evolution revolution, oh look he found a psychology textbook, that boy is threat level red, my pokeymans let me show you them

Leave a comment

usedmapquest October 24 2011, 02:45:05 UTC
I believe that environment is a large factor in a person's upbringing, especially in situations to the person's detriment, by which I mean that negative events in a person's upbringing weigh heavily on their overall nature, more so than I believe the nature holds up against it.

However I have no idea how that applies to Pokémon.

Reply

usedlaserbeam October 24 2011, 03:26:18 UTC
But not so strongly in situations to the person's benefit? I think I agree with you - punishment generally seems to be a stronger, faster method of shaping a person's behavior than reward.

And perhaps it would follow, then, that Pokemon raised to fear their trainer will show dramatically different personalities than those raised to love the one commanding them.

Reply

usedmapquest October 24 2011, 03:29:45 UTC
Unfortunately, although irrelevantly to this discussion, I have not been in a situation to observe kindness and nurturing in childrearing, and cannot speak as to their effects. However, despite the 'strength' of a harsh upbringing and the effects thereof, I do not believe it to entirely overwrite one's base personality, kindness… and suchlike! While the personality would be different, I do not believe that one raised in a cruel manner then becomes cruel!

Reply

usedlaserbeam October 24 2011, 03:43:04 UTC
...I beg your pardon - you've NEVER observed kindness and nurturing in childrearing?

Reply

usedmapquest October 24 2011, 03:46:01 UTC
I grew up in a group orphanage until I joined the military academy at 14. While they were by no means cruel, it was not that sort of environment. As I said, irrelevant to the discussion at hand.

Reply

usedlaserbeam October 24 2011, 03:50:22 UTC
Ah, I see. Forgive me, I was more taken by the totality of the statement than anything else.

And for what it's worth, I agree with you. A cruel upbringing might make you more susceptible to cruel actions, simply by virtue of the fact that humans tend to model the behavior they see. But I don't think it's an eventuality by any means.

Reply

usedmapquest October 24 2011, 04:34:28 UTC
I can say for a fact that it is not.

Reply

usedlaserbeam October 24 2011, 04:37:39 UTC
At the risk of veering off on a slight tangent once again, may I ask your occupation here in Johto? As a trainer or a breeder, that is.

Reply

usedmapquest October 24 2011, 04:44:27 UTC
I suppose I would be considered a trainer, although I have little interest in either.

Reply

usedlaserbeam October 24 2011, 04:45:59 UTC
I see. That would've been my next question: through what methods do you raise your Pokemon? But if you have no interest in that sort of thing, the point is somewhat moot.

Reply

usedmapquest October 24 2011, 04:47:29 UTC
I spend an hour or so each day training my duck against the wild creatures around the town. It has been proven that they are the best protection in this world… and I would rather be prepared than not. However, to use them in a competitive sense seems odd to me.

Reply

usedlaserbeam October 24 2011, 04:49:15 UTC
That's a sensible course of action. My interests tend to lie more in the breeding aspect - hence the philosophical musings.

Reply

usedmapquest October 24 2011, 04:51:16 UTC
It's really just animal husbandry, isn't it?

Reply

usedlaserbeam October 24 2011, 04:54:18 UTC
Essentially. But is animal husbandry ethical when the animals in question may very well be sentient themselves?

Reply

usedmapquest October 24 2011, 04:56:05 UTC
Then it would be prostitution. ( that may have been a very very dry joke. )

Reply

usedlaserbeam October 24 2011, 05:02:21 UTC
Which solves admirably the problem of animal husbandry, if not the one of the ethics.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up