I am not a great fan of the Church of England. Its average level of spirituality fails to impress, which is why I am in Orthodoxy.
But one thing I do miss is the Anglican approach to money. This I find far superior to the Russian model. Priests all get a pretty standard salary, paid centrally. Each church knows at the beginning of the year how much
(
Read more... )
By the way, what is is usual monthly salary?
Reply
The salary figures I picked up on the net are:
Curates: £14,680-£15,820
Parish clergy: £16,420
Cathedral-based canons: £20,200
Junior bishops: £24,790
Diocesan bishops: £30,120
Archbishop of Canterbury: £55,660
These are 6 years old, so add another 15% or so for inflation. OK, priests normally have free housing, but this is not riches if you are raising a family.
But more to the point, a church building can be hideously expensive to keep in order - repairs, heating etc. From the notices I see in church buildings, for a medium-sized 15th century church (and there are an awful lot of them around), you are easily talking £ 25,000 a year. The cost of a cathedral, excluding clergy, is more than £ 1 million a year.
Reply
Reply
It used to be worse - 40 years ago, when I considered priesthood, this was a road to (genteel) poverty. I have heard that marrying pious women from wealthier families was one way out of the trap, especially for a priest expected to function at the higher end of the social ladder.
The real financial problem today is schooling - every priest with a family is desperate to be sent to a part of the country where secondary schooling is still good (i.e. normally with separate grammar schools and not cmprehensives)and free.
Offtop: who, if any, of the gang went to Perwijze yesterday?
Reply
There were many people from different origins: like locals, russians, greek etc.
I was there for the first time and it was good to go there and see. I liked it. After all, it is the only monastery we have.
Reply
Leave a comment