i think it was that the leather shorts were on a fairly skinny arse and on top of some quite hairy legs. i can imagine them working better in other contexts/on other arses.
Sometimes I think that to the extent this is true, it's because some queer women: 1. Do not read as gay and/or 2. Avoid queer events like the plague (possibly because they feel alienated from dyke culture)and/or 3. Have a different standard of attractiveness that they aspire to than the one you are using.
But yeah, to speak in broad generalizations, I'd say that many visibly gay men place a high priority on their physical attractiveness and many visibly queer women have other concerns they place far, far ahead.
yeah, 3 is what i'm sulking about here. i figure that "according to my standards of attractiveness" is always implied in "better looking" which is (john cleese notwithstanding) essentially subjective.
just my bad luck, i guess. OTOH, it does make gay men pretty much nature's perfect eyecandy. all mwrowr, no muss no fuss.
RE: 3, sometimes it is possible to enlarge one's standards of attractiveness. SOmehow, I have started to find people attractive that I would not have a while ago. I'm not sure what that is a bout, but since it adds to my enjoyment of the world, I'm not complaining.
But yeah, perfect eyecandy gay men with no messy possibilities to muck things up is a fun side dish.
there was a gay rights march in my little town. they closed down mainstreet for us and everything. we even got a few manyl men out of the sports bar and into the march with us.
i got a pin out of it, too. 'straight but not narrow' and am thinking of giving it to my mom cos ... erm... it doesn't really work for me anymore. lol.
Comments 20
*sigh*
Reply
on the other hand, the leather shorts i could really do without.
Reply
but then, i have hag-ish leanings. i think they're all so cuuuuuuuuuuute. *pinches cheeks*
Reply
i'm shocked.
i think it was that the leather shorts were on a fairly skinny arse and on top of some quite hairy legs. i can imagine them working better in other contexts/on other arses.
the dyke mullet, otoh...
*sighs self-pityingly*
Reply
I realize that our motivations may be wildly different, but I hope that you don't mind me joining you in sulking.
Reply
from your point of view i should think that would be a plus, though.
Reply
Even telling myself the "ugly duckling" story where I turn out to be "pretty fly ...for a straight guy" just doesn't soothe the wounded ego.
Reply
Reply
i bet it's all about the cleanse-tone-exfoliate.
being a straight man, that probably means nothing to you.
Reply
1. Do not read as gay and/or
2. Avoid queer events like the plague (possibly because they feel alienated from dyke culture)and/or
3. Have a different standard of attractiveness that they aspire to than the one you are using.
But yeah, to speak in broad generalizations, I'd say that many visibly gay men place a high priority on their physical attractiveness and many visibly queer women have other concerns they place far, far ahead.
Reply
yeah, 3 is what i'm sulking about here. i figure that "according to my standards of attractiveness" is always implied in "better looking" which is (john cleese notwithstanding) essentially subjective.
just my bad luck, i guess. OTOH, it does make gay men pretty much nature's perfect eyecandy. all mwrowr, no muss no fuss.
Reply
But yeah, perfect eyecandy gay men with no messy possibilities to muck things up is a fun side dish.
Reply
Reply
i got a pin out of it, too. 'straight but not narrow' and am thinking of giving it to my mom cos ... erm... it doesn't really work for me anymore. lol.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment