Until Word is Cornered, all Math is Fiction.
My long entries are made bearable by low frequency, so I apologize for this week. I haven't been sleeping so I post instead. I thought this was interesting and amusing. It was my attempt to claim the $1,000.00 for refuting timecube theory. Gene Ray, innovator, philosopher, and cubic thinker presents his counterarguments to my refutations afterwards.
Andrew: Your timecube model proposes to explain time with a four-day per rotation theory. However, the rotation of the earth occurs IN time and is not actually a part of time itself. What I mean to say is, if the earth were to stop rotating, time would certainly continue (Unless you are zen enough to suggest that the earth leaving it's precarious orbit and rotation cycle would destroy all people and clocks, "So what is time if there's no one to notice it passing?"). Time may be cubic, but I don't think the theory that there are four days in one revolution shows that time is irrefutably cubic, or shows us anything about the nature of time's constitution.
In addition, I believe that the reasoning behind the four day per rotation model is flawed. We have to assume that there are only four characteristics defining a day; sunrise, midday, sunset, and midnight. If those four attributes were all that qualified one day, certainly there would be four days in one rotation (at least) since on four equidistant locations on the equatorial hemisphere and all of the locations in longitudinal line with these four example points (excluding the most polar ones) will experience four sunrises, four middays, four sunsets, and four midnights in accumulated total in one 24 hour period, adding up to 4 days. I assert that the definition of one day has more requirements than your four parts. A day should be defined by the sunrise, midday, sunset, and midnight in a single geographic location, or the time from midnight to midnight (one day cycle) in a single location. Otherwise we could say that the number of days in one 24-hour rotation is almost anywhere between one and infinity, depending on the number of locations you choose to represent your samples.
Let's say the human life cycle is cubic like the circadian cycle. Let's say that what makes one human life is conception, development, birth, and death (four inalienable aspects of each human life). If we were to tally up all human conceptions and all developments and all births and all deaths at any length of time from any point in time, we would probably never get all four columns of numbers to agree on how many human lives were occurring, even though more traditional means, like censuses could give you at least a clear estimate.
The point I'm making is, days are measured and constant, but they can't be cut up with events traded among geographies. You cannot add the conception and development of one person to the birth of another and the death of yet another that all happen in the same year and count it as one life in less than one year. It ignores all of the important aspects of life, the same way your four day model ignores the importance of geographical consistence.
p.s. Can you send me my $1000.00 through paypal?
Mr. Ray: Sorry, you are all wrong. Earth and Time are relative and without one,the other does not exist. Nothing exists without Time, without Earth or without rotation. All creation has existed through the Time Cube Principle - and educated stupid humans have not the rationale to notice - even when informed of the higher order. Infinite days would require infinite hour hands - whereas a day for each of 360 degrees would equate to only 360 days - far from infinite. I assure you that 1 hour hand with 3 stubs added, equates Nature's Cubic Time. Your 4-corner head has only a single corner face - or do you claim that your nose corner is infinite? A Cube corner or 1 Hemisphere corner equates to 90 degrees - not a single degree. Where 1 corner stops, the next corner begins. I do not have the Time to tutor on all the Cubic points of Creation. You have your own brain for such evaluations. Word is the greatest human evil and only contradictory evil word has the power to match and destroy it - destroying both. No other animal invents word that induces the plunder of its own children and natural environment.
Gene Ray
Andrew: Your timecube model proposes to explain time with a four-day per rotation theory. However, the rotation of the earth occurs IN time and is not actually a part of time itself. What I mean to say is, if the earth were to stop rotating, time would certainly continue (Unless you are zen enough to suggest that the earth leaving it's precarious orbit and rotation cycle would destroy all people and clocks, "So what is time if there's no one to notice it passing?"). Time may be cubic, but I don't think the theory that there are four days in one revolution shows that time is irrefutably cubic, or shows us anything about the nature of time's constitution.
In addition, I believe that the reasoning behind the four day per rotation model is flawed. We have to assume that there are only four characteristics defining a day; sunrise, midday, sunset, and midnight. If those four attributes were all that qualified one day, certainly there would be four days in one rotation (at least) since on four equidistant locations on the equatorial hemisphere and all of the locations in longitudinal line with these four example points (excluding the most polar ones) will experience four sunrises, four middays, four sunsets, and four midnights in accumulated total in one 24 hour period, adding up to 4 days. I assert that the definition of one day has more requirements than your four parts. A day should be defined by the sunrise, midday, sunset, and midnight in a single geographic location, or the time from midnight to midnight (one day cycle) in a single location. Otherwise we could say that the number of days in one 24-hour rotation is almost anywhere between one and infinity, depending on the number of locations you choose to represent your samples.
Let's say the human life cycle is cubic like the circadian cycle. Let's say that what makes one human life is conception, development, birth, and death (four inalienable aspects of each human life). If we were to tally up all human conceptions and all developments and all births and all deaths at any length of time from any point in time, we would probably never get all four columns of numbers to agree on how many human lives were occurring, even though more traditional means, like censuses could give you at least a clear estimate.
The point I'm making is, days are measured and constant, but they can't be cut up with events traded among geographies. You cannot add the conception and development of one person to the birth of another and the death of yet another that all happen in the same year and count it as one life in less than one year. It ignores all of the important aspects of life, the same way your four day model ignores the importance of geographical consistence.
p.s. Can you send me my $1000.00 through paypal?
Mr. Ray: Sorry, you are all wrong. Earth and Time are relative and without one,the other does not exist. Nothing exists without Time, without Earth or without rotation. All creation has existed through the Time Cube Principle - and educated stupid humans have not the rationale to notice - even when informed of the higher order. Infinite days would require infinite hour hands - whereas a day for each of 360 degrees would equate to only 360 days - far from infinite. I assure you that 1 hour hand with 3 stubs added, equates Nature's Cubic Time. Your 4-corner head has only a single corner face - or do you claim that your nose corner is infinite? A Cube corner or 1 Hemisphere corner equates to 90 degrees - not a single degree. Where 1 corner stops, the next corner begins. I do not have the Time to tutor on all the Cubic points of Creation. You have your own brain for such evaluations. Word is the greatest human evil and only contradictory evil word has the power to match and destroy it - destroying both. No other animal invents word that induces the plunder of its own children and natural environment.
Gene Ray