You fail to make any point. You were a member of and Governor of, if I remember correctly, JSA. You should know how to form a decent argument however, you're falling far shorter than I would have predicted.
Your argument is based around how I'm egotistical no matter what I say, how anything I say is stupid, and how you're arrogant so you won't listen to a word I say. So, in essence, all you're doing is calling me names, and calling that an argument?
Where is your proof? Where is your evidence? What "facts" am I arguing with? Stop taking what I say as an insult, and try thinking about this without becoming emotionally involved in it.
My point is that you don't know me, Sara, or this situation well enough to make any valid comments on what should have been done, or on either my or Sara's mental states. You know how to argue well, and you should know that the proper way to argue is to disprove my point in some fashion. I did so to all of your initial points by pointing out that you're making far too many assumptions with far too little information. Prove me wrong, and I will accept your analysis. Thus far, however, you've just offered unfounded conjectures and rude words coupled with poor insults.
Because you were an IB Student, are a college student, were a former JSA leader, and are a person I respect (though I now don't like), I hope you'll respond more intelligently than you just did. However, if you continue this useless namecalling and immature writing, then I'll just ignore you, as I have so many other unintelligent posters.
-David
PS: Any demeaning comments made in this entry were only in retort to the insults you laid at my feet. I figured I might as well repay you in full.
Not surprised...inretrospektSeptember 13 2004, 12:49:20 UTC
Why does that always seem to be your reply to any argument? Instead of merely (if it's such a bad arguemnt) refuting it, instead you complain about how the argument is worthless. If the debate was so fucking stupid, you could EASILY win it, but instead you ignore the argument, and deem it always with weak points, or no points. Have you noticed that you ALWAYS do this? Every single time. Look back and at least notice you're not entitled to be elitist, nor are you the best debate candidate either. If you're so much more intelligent (or plain old intelligent), then why don't you just simply refute the "ignorant" arguments and not just tell the person to "do better"? When is an argument going to be good enough for you to participate in?
Your argument is based around how I'm egotistical no matter what I say, how anything I say is stupid, and how you're arrogant so you won't listen to a word I say. So, in essence, all you're doing is calling me names, and calling that an argument?
Where is your proof? Where is your evidence? What "facts" am I arguing with? Stop taking what I say as an insult, and try thinking about this without becoming emotionally involved in it.
My point is that you don't know me, Sara, or this situation well enough to make any valid comments on what should have been done, or on either my or Sara's mental states. You know how to argue well, and you should know that the proper way to argue is to disprove my point in some fashion. I did so to all of your initial points by pointing out that you're making far too many assumptions with far too little information. Prove me wrong, and I will accept your analysis. Thus far, however, you've just offered unfounded conjectures and rude words coupled with poor insults.
Because you were an IB Student, are a college student, were a former JSA leader, and are a person I respect (though I now don't like), I hope you'll respond more intelligently than you just did. However, if you continue this useless namecalling and immature writing, then I'll just ignore you, as I have so many other unintelligent posters.
-David
PS: Any demeaning comments made in this entry were only in retort to the insults you laid at my feet. I figured I might as well repay you in full.
Reply
If you're so much more intelligent (or plain old intelligent), then why don't you just simply refute the "ignorant" arguments and not just tell the person to "do better"?
When is an argument going to be good enough for you to participate in?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment