Comments | ugly_crap: Who doesn't want their baby in animal skin?

jrod1195 in ugly_crap

Who doesn't want their baby in animal skin?

Nov 12, 2009 22:16

( Read more... )

fug shoes, shoot the buyer, babygirl boutique

Comments 34

iron_irony November 13 2009, 03:17:26 UTC

Hm.. actually they're kind of cute, considering they're for babies. But no way at that price.

dharawal November 13 2009, 03:21:00 UTC

I dunno, I think they're cute, very very well made, and leather isn't cheap, but I wouldn't pay that for them.

(The comment has been removed)

lady_sesstra November 13 2009, 03:36:32 UTC

LOL IRL

mighty_carrot November 13 2009, 03:41:59 UTC

LOL

the_reda November 13 2009, 04:10:40 UTC

lol

Plastic is so much better. Trufax.

Thread 8

snobahr November 13 2009, 03:33:24 UTC

I'm fine with animal skin on my kid. If those shoes are as well-crafted as they photographed, I'd almost say that $125 is reasonable. I don't find that outrageous for the items, materials and workmanship, but I'm not sure I'd want to use them for baby shoes. Maybe on a doll for a Santa's Workshop display or some other small fantasy elfin scenario.

thornsofhavok13 November 13 2009, 03:44:10 UTC

f'ugh.