The Trials of Motherhood...

Apr 07, 2004 12:25

Since when did it become an accomplishment to be a "good eater". Most people try to take the opposition and diet, but mother's won't have none of that when concerning their offspring. I just don't understand why modern mommies are always so proud of their fucking fat, tub-of-lard kids when they perform the simple task of eating their dinner- plus ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 11

new_night April 7 2004, 13:46:47 UTC
hahaha

very george carlin, i feel ya

Reply

uber_corp April 7 2004, 14:59:42 UTC
Thank you, I'm glad I'm not the only one who sees the hypocracy in this scenario. I just noticed we both look a bit psychotic in our pictures. What the fuck is so interesting to our left?

Reply

new_night April 7 2004, 15:44:25 UTC
it's that glowing, purplish blue monster.

Reply

uber_corp April 8 2004, 06:07:13 UTC
Does he only have one eye and one horn? I hope he doesn't eat people...

Reply


Lessons on motherhood from the anti-parent. uber_pdx April 7 2004, 22:27:53 UTC
Being a god eater is huge when you're a kid. Even if you are an unusually large 3 year old. Being a good eater means that your fucking sweet tooth is gonna get the stroking it deserves after you finish your Americized Extra Value Meal from McJack-in-the-king. And if that ooey-gooey hot fudge lard enhancement ain't good enough for you, you'll also get a great wall sized block in your colon along with a shiny new toy. So if you don't like the country's parenting habbits, in regards to feeding, you can leave this country, because there is a new generation of mega fat asses coming up in this world that need the room. Or there is the ever popular option of getting them smoking and drinking coffee at such a young age that food is merely not necessary. Then you run into the problem of 8 year olds tweekin' out from there grande quad-skinny-soy-mochalattecino in your face talking to you about pogs and other bullshit things kids do while sucking on Marlboro reds. When that doesn't become enough, they'll move on to more glamorous things ( ... )

Reply


FATTY's RULE YOU SUPERFICIAL FUCKS anonymous April 7 2004, 22:53:42 UTC
I hate to be the whiney hippie trying to be all "P.C." or whatever. But, c'mon. Leave the porkers alone! Not only will the torment of jelly roll stomachs and hot dog roll neck forever serve as a constant reminder, that the subject in question, is flawed. Always the but of lame ass jokes, stupid nick names (i.e. "Tiny"), establishing any social normalcy later in life is impossible. ALL because you and the rest of your cool guy hipster buddies can't look beyond the physicality. Is it really his/her fault that Mama gotta eat fried taters? We have no control over our eating habits during childhood. Which unfortunately is when it is the most important developmentally for human beings. Our consumption habits than still in some way or another affect us all through life. So, in short, yes, obescity is bad. Bad for the sufferer. The next time Maury Povich parades two year old two ton babies on national television, ask yourself,'Hmmm..,Who deserves a joke at their expense? The baby unable to make choices that won't make him so ( ... )

Reply

Re: FATTY's RULE YOU SUPERFICIAL FUCKS new_night April 7 2004, 23:56:09 UTC
There's no reason to "leave them alone", gluttony is wrong and they should fucking know it.

Obesity is the #1 killer in the world, next to STARVATION.

Reply

Re: FATTY's RULE YOU SUPERFICIAL FUCKS uber_corp April 8 2004, 06:12:51 UTC
Wow, the irony is killing me. Is that the #3 killer?

Reply


anonymous April 8 2004, 00:05:25 UTC
Look what you started, Bana.

Reply

uber_corp April 8 2004, 06:14:14 UTC
I thought my condesending rants would be a converasation stimulator (along with my monday morning tape, special for you...)

Reply

anonymous April 9 2004, 21:08:01 UTC
maybe you should get up earlier!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up