In states where medical marijuana is legal and marijuana in general is decriminalized, people can still be arrested, prosecuted, and sentenced because of marijuana distribution and possession. How is this possible? It’s possible because, according to federal law, marijuana is still illegal. This seems like a blatant disregard of democracy, because
(
Read more... )
In addition, in a recent study by the Mayo Clinic, THC was shown to be less effective than standard treatments in helping cancer patients regain lost appetites.
The American Medical Association recommends that marijuana remain a Schedule I controlled substance.
The DEA supports research into the safety and efficacy of THC (the major psychoactive component of marijuana), and such studies are ongoing, supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
As a result of such research, a synthetic THC drug, Marinol, has been available to the public since 1985. The Food and Drug Administration has determined that Marinol is safe, effective, and has therapeutic benefits for use as a treatment for nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy, and as a treatment of weight loss in patients with AIDS. However, it does not produce the harmful health effects associated with smoking marijuana.
Furthermore, the DEA recently approved the University of California San Diego to undertake rigorous scientific studies to assess the safety and efficacy of cannabis compounds for treating certain debilitating medical conditions.
It's also important to realize that the campaign to allow marijuana to be used as medicine is a tactical maneuver in an overall strategy to completely legalize the drug. Pro-legalization groups have transformed the debate from decriminalizing drug use to one of compassion and care for people with serious diseases. The New York Times interviewed Ethan Nadelman, Director of the Lindesmith Center. Responding to criticism from former Drug Czar Barry McCaffrey that the medical marijuana issue is a stalking-horse for drug legalization, Mr. Nadelman did not contradict General McCaffrey. "Will it help lead toward marijuana legaization?" Mr. Nadelman said: "I hope so."
Also, consider the public safety of others when confronted with intoxicated drug users:
Marijuana affects many skills required for safe driving: alertness, the ability to concentrate, coordination, and reaction time. These effects can last up to 24 hours after smoking marijuana. Marijuana use can make it difficult to judge distances and react to signals and signs on the road.
The National Transportation Safety Board studied 182 fatal truck accidents. It found that just as many of the accidents were caused by drivers using marijuana as were caused by alcohol -- 12.5 percent in each case.
Consider also that drug use, including marijuana, contributes to crime. A large percentage of those arrested for crimes test positive for marijuana. Nationwide, 40 percent of adult males tested positive for marijuana at the time of their arrest. It's not the primary reason they were arrested, it more than likely was the cause.
Among marijuana's most harmful consequences is its role in leading to the use of other illegal drugs like heroin and cocaine. Long-term studies of students who use drugs show that very few young people use other illegal drugs without first trying marijuana. While not all people who use marijuana go on to use other drugs, using marijuana sometimes lowers inhibitions about drug use and exposes users to a culture that encourages use of other drugs.
The risk of using cocaine has been estimated to be more than 104 times greater for those who have tried marijuana than for those who have never tried it.
In Summary:
Marijuana is a dangerous, addictive drug that poses significant health threats to users.
Marijuana has no medical value that can't be met more effectively by legal drugs.
Marijuana users are far more likely to use other drugs like cocaine and heroin than non-marijuana users.
Drug legalizers use "medical marijuana" as red herring in effort to advocate broader legalization of drug use.
Reply
The point I'm trying to make is that people should be able to choose for themselves. Yeah, it has risks, but its no more dangerous than alcohol or tobacco, which are both legal. Someone's life shouldn't be ruined with prison time just because they smoke weed. It's a nonviolent crime and they're hurting nobody but themselves when they do it.
Reply
Heroin and crack "only hurt the people who use them," but these drugs shouldn't be legalized either.
Reply
Also, weed doesn't make you commit crimes. The main reason a majority of criminals smoke weed is because they dont care about breaking the law anyway, and its of easy access to them. A person who's going to commit a crime is going to do it regardless of whether they smoke or not.
Reply
And it's a possibility that it doesn't cause the crimes, but even if it doesn't - it's pretty obvious that they go hand-in-hand. Why encourage something that criminals find rebellious? If they did it solely because it was against the law, it's like giving them a pat on the back and a handshake for doing something they knew was wrong. It reinforces their negative behavior.
You don't hate me now, right? haha 'cause I still like you. :D I find this a lot like my 10th grade debate class. It's interesting to actually hear both sides and express your opinions and beliefs. What would the world be like if everyone had the same view?
Reply
Legalizing weed wouldn't reinforce their behavior, its not like we're making murder and rape legal too.
And no, I definitely don't hate you =P This is the first time I've actually gotten to debate the topic. Most people are just closed minded and are like "Nope, you're wrong, later."
You do make alot of good points, but regardless, I still don't think people should be punished as severely as they are for posessing weed.
If weed were legalized then yes, there should be some strict laws that go with it, including laws against impaired driving and an age limit. People are going to smoke regardless of the law, so legalizing it would be doing alot more good than harm.
Reply
And no... it's not just reinforcement. It's just saying that what they did was okay - when it was against the law. That's like telling a little kid that was doing something that was against the rules at the time, that he's not in trouble now even though he was bad. Mkay. That was a really bad example. But you know what I'm saying, right? I just got done working from 8-5 so I'm a little braindead. Ugh.
Yeah, there would have to be age restrictions and strict laws... but of course, that's just setting more rules for smokers to break. Regardless of these strict laws and anti-impaired driving rules, these people are going to do it anyway. As you said, people are going to smoke regardless of the law. And even that some do it solely because it's against the rules. Make it legal and more accessible, and it will bring more people to try it and start smoking on a regular basis... the outcome is more wrecks and people trying to function in society while under the influence. I think there are enough problems with the many people who do it already. To broaden the amount of people using the drug will only make matters worse.
Reply
Leave a comment