Conquest has seriously pissed me off this year. I've been right on the edge of cancelling my games (which would seem to hardly matter at the moment, as so few people are signed up, but I really don't like the idea of cancelling).
Anybody notice that there was no sign of one of my blurbs on the website until a week after all the others went up? That'
(
Read more... )
It would be Random who is responsible for fixing problems encountered by writers. He is the writer wrangler, a role that, in theory, encompasses a lot more than just persuading someone to submit a blurb.
Although, I may be able to supply you with a fix for that particular problem, independent of the organisers. You are co-writing with Nick, right? If he submitted the blurb into AON, odds are that you've never been added as a writer. To fix this:
Random can use his con-org powers to stand in for one or both of you in this process, but he would have to do the same thing to fix it.
Timetabling for tabletop games is generally pretty flexible. As long as you have a half-dozen sessions available it generally doesn't matter too much, especially if you are willing to open extra sessions when you happen to be free at the con. It is the freeforms where the timetables really matter. In fact, I just closed down a bunch of sessions yesterday (well, Random did it for me), because I'm not going to let what very few players will sign up for my game at this late stage spread themselves all across the weekend. Of course, the website does not reflect this change yet, nor the fact of my statement that I will not be opening a second session of The Moot whatever happens.
Reply
Leave a comment