To A or not 2A?

Apr 06, 2009 17:47

So, I'm kind of afraid to watch Ashes to Ashes.

Short reason, short poll. Some A2A spoilers re the premise itself. )

a2a, poll

Leave a comment

kimboosan April 6 2009, 23:59:38 UTC
All that follows is IMHO:

Gene is not the same Gene, and you will either love him for it (hello, "Galex" fans) or...you won't. I don't hate him in A2A but to me he is a shadow character of who he was in LoM.

Keely Hawes is actually really good in the series, it is the writing of her character that makes me cringe. I admit that by the last four episodes, I was at the "get better or I'm dropping out" stage and Lo! It got better!

I enjoyed it overall, but as far as quality goes, it is 1/3 of what LoM was. And a lot of that falls back on what they did with Gene. Alex Drake got on my nerves sometimes, and I loved her sometimes, and that character took a huge brundt of the fan-hate for the show, but I think she was just an easy target.

There is much back and forth on whether A2A is canon to LoM -- there is a good argument that it isn't. I can't go into WHY without doing the whole spoilery thing for LoM. But I'll say that the reason it isn't to ME is because Gene is so fundamentally different.

SO: Should you watch A2A? Only if you are prepared to take it as a completely separate show, which incidentally has "a" Gene Hunt who bears some resemblance to "the" Gene Hunt of LoM. If you are looking for a legit sequel to LoM, though, you will HATE it.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up